In a final blow to Nike Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear its appeal against a patent decision favoring Adidas, effectively closing a long-standing legal battle over sneaker technology patents.
Now the U.S. Supreme Court reportedly rejected Nike’s appeal, and since it is already the highest tribunal, the long-standing legal battle with Adidas is now considered a solved case.
As per JD Journal, the Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal filed by Nike, wherein it is seeking to overturn the decision of the Patent Office court. The verdict from the lower court was upheld by the bureau’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and apparently, the justices at the higher court made the same decision as well.
It was mentioned that the lawsuits between Nike and Adidas have been going on for years as they have been fighting over a number of patents related to the application of technology in their respective shoe designs. In fact, in 2012, the German sneaker and sportswear manufacturer petitioned the patent office tribunal to nullify one of Nike’s patents involving the seamless knitted upper parts of the sneakers.
At that time, the tribunal accepted the Air Jordan maker’s request to cancel parts of its patent but did not allow the firm to revise the patent. It was explained that it was declined based on the fact that there was an earlier publication that covered the same innovation which Nike is proposing as a substitute for some patent elements.
Reuters reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals, specializing in patent disputes, sent the case back to the board two times and finally dismissed Nike’s third appeal last year. The company told the court in March that the board should not have been allowed to scrap a substitute patent element as they please, based on reasonings that Adidas did not bring up at the time.
In any case, the latest decision of the Supreme Court not to review the case put a legal end to the proceedings - with finality. This is because the outcome has left Nike with no other way to pursue its patent case against Adidas in the U.S. judicial system.
Photo by: Lennart Uecker/Unsplash


Gold Prices Hold Near Record Levels as Inflation Concerns Offset Middle East Ceasefire Hopes
ECB’s Philip Lane Warns Middle East Conflict Could Keep Inflation Elevated
MongoDB Q1 FY2027 Earnings Beat Expectations, Raises Full-Year Outlook
Samsung to Invest $1.5 Billion in Vietnam Semiconductor Testing Plant by 2027
European Stocks Rise as AI Optimism Offsets U.S.-Iran Tensions
US Launches New Trade Investigation Into Vietnam Over Intellectual Property Concerns
Snowflake Stock Soars 30% After Q1 Earnings Beat and Major AWS AI Partnership
Salesforce Q1 FY2027 Earnings Beat Expectations Despite Soft Q2 Revenue Outlook
Asian Markets Slide as New U.S. Strikes on Iran Spark Investor Caution
U.S. Launches New Strikes on Iran as Trump Signals Peace Deal Uncertainty
JPMorgan Sees Biotech Sector at Turning Point, Upgrades Top Pharma Stocks
Oil Prices Jump After New U.S. Strikes on Iran Raise Supply Concerns
SpaceX IPO Could Become Largest in History with $1.8 Trillion Valuation Target
Kentucky School District Secures $27 Million in Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Settlements
Oil Prices Set for Sharp Weekly Losses as U.S.-Iran Ceasefire Hopes Ease Supply Concerns
CTOC Goes Live on Bitget Wallet Trading, Expanding Global Access to AI-Powered Healthcare Data Ecosystem 



