In a final blow to Nike Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear its appeal against a patent decision favoring Adidas, effectively closing a long-standing legal battle over sneaker technology patents.
Now the U.S. Supreme Court reportedly rejected Nike’s appeal, and since it is already the highest tribunal, the long-standing legal battle with Adidas is now considered a solved case.
As per JD Journal, the Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal filed by Nike, wherein it is seeking to overturn the decision of the Patent Office court. The verdict from the lower court was upheld by the bureau’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and apparently, the justices at the higher court made the same decision as well.
It was mentioned that the lawsuits between Nike and Adidas have been going on for years as they have been fighting over a number of patents related to the application of technology in their respective shoe designs. In fact, in 2012, the German sneaker and sportswear manufacturer petitioned the patent office tribunal to nullify one of Nike’s patents involving the seamless knitted upper parts of the sneakers.
At that time, the tribunal accepted the Air Jordan maker’s request to cancel parts of its patent but did not allow the firm to revise the patent. It was explained that it was declined based on the fact that there was an earlier publication that covered the same innovation which Nike is proposing as a substitute for some patent elements.
Reuters reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals, specializing in patent disputes, sent the case back to the board two times and finally dismissed Nike’s third appeal last year. The company told the court in March that the board should not have been allowed to scrap a substitute patent element as they please, based on reasonings that Adidas did not bring up at the time.
In any case, the latest decision of the Supreme Court not to review the case put a legal end to the proceedings - with finality. This is because the outcome has left Nike with no other way to pursue its patent case against Adidas in the U.S. judicial system.
Photo by: Lennart Uecker/Unsplash


Trump Requests $11 Billion More in Farm Aid as Rising Costs Pressure U.S. Farmers
Australia Jobs Growth Strengthens Rate Hike Outlook
Amazon Prime Day 2026 Sales Top $26.4 Billion as Shoppers Chase Discounts Amid Inflation
Nomura Stock Upgraded to Buy by BofA as Stronger ROE and Earnings Growth Boost Outlook
Cerebras Revenue Forecast Tops Expectations, but Margin Concerns Weigh on Stock
Bank Regulation Rollbacks in the U.S. and UK Could Increase Financial Risks, Study Warns
Wall Street Ends Mixed as Micron Surges, Apple Drops After Price Hikes
S&P Affirms Brazil’s BB Credit Rating with Stable Outlook Amid Fiscal Challenges
Asian Currencies Trade Mixed as Yen Hovers Near 40-Year Low, Dollar Holds Firm on Fed Outlook
Trump Threatens 100% Tariffs on Countries Imposing Digital Services Taxes on U.S. Tech Firms
Apple Supplier Stocks Slide as Samsung, SK Hynix Lead Selloff After Apple Price Hikes
Anthropic AI Model Uncovers Vulnerabilities in Classified U.S. Government Systems During Security Test
US Judge Seeks Explanation for DOJ’s Decision to Drop Gautam Adani Bribery Case
Gold Prices Fall Below $4,000 as Strong Dollar, Fed Rate Hike Bets Weigh on Bullion
Alibaba Shares Fall After Anthropic Alleges Massive AI Model Distillation Campaign
Gold Drops Below $4,000 as Strong US Dollar and Fed Rate Hike Expectations Pressure Bullion
Samsung, SK Hynix to Unveil Record AI and Semiconductor Investment Plans Worth Over $646 Billion 



