In a final blow to Nike Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear its appeal against a patent decision favoring Adidas, effectively closing a long-standing legal battle over sneaker technology patents.
Now the U.S. Supreme Court reportedly rejected Nike’s appeal, and since it is already the highest tribunal, the long-standing legal battle with Adidas is now considered a solved case.
As per JD Journal, the Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal filed by Nike, wherein it is seeking to overturn the decision of the Patent Office court. The verdict from the lower court was upheld by the bureau’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and apparently, the justices at the higher court made the same decision as well.
It was mentioned that the lawsuits between Nike and Adidas have been going on for years as they have been fighting over a number of patents related to the application of technology in their respective shoe designs. In fact, in 2012, the German sneaker and sportswear manufacturer petitioned the patent office tribunal to nullify one of Nike’s patents involving the seamless knitted upper parts of the sneakers.
At that time, the tribunal accepted the Air Jordan maker’s request to cancel parts of its patent but did not allow the firm to revise the patent. It was explained that it was declined based on the fact that there was an earlier publication that covered the same innovation which Nike is proposing as a substitute for some patent elements.
Reuters reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals, specializing in patent disputes, sent the case back to the board two times and finally dismissed Nike’s third appeal last year. The company told the court in March that the board should not have been allowed to scrap a substitute patent element as they please, based on reasonings that Adidas did not bring up at the time.
In any case, the latest decision of the Supreme Court not to review the case put a legal end to the proceedings - with finality. This is because the outcome has left Nike with no other way to pursue its patent case against Adidas in the U.S. judicial system.
Photo by: Lennart Uecker/Unsplash


China Extends Gold Buying Streak as Reserves Surge Despite Volatile Prices
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users
Thailand Inflation Remains Negative for 10th Straight Month in January
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
South Africa Eyes ECB Repo Lines as Inflation Eases and Rate Cuts Loom
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised
Gold and Silver Prices Slide as Dollar Strength and Easing Tensions Weigh on Metals
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings
Dollar Near Two-Week High as Stock Rout, AI Concerns and Global Events Drive Market Volatility
Oil Prices Slide on US-Iran Talks, Dollar Strength and Profit-Taking Pressure
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate
South Korea’s Weak Won Struggles as Retail Investors Pour Money Into U.S. Stocks 



