Pyongyang has taken efforts to diminish its fears of its citizens getting influenced by South Korean culture. North Korea further continues its crackdown on South Korean influence in the isolated nation, by forcing women to call their lovers by a different term of endearment.
There is an ongoing campaign by North Korea to rid the nation of its southern counterpart’s influence on culture, having already banned fashion, music, and hairstyles from South Korea on its citizens. South Korean slang has also been added to what is supposedly forbidden now in North Korea. Last June, South Korean politician Ha Tae Keung reported that intelligence reports have now revealed that North Korean women are no longer allowed to call their lovers “oppa” but rather “male comrades.”
To note, “oppa” is commonly used by women to call their romantic partners in South Korea as well as a term to call a man who is older than the woman.
This comes as North Korean outlet Roding Sinmun published a piece denouncing any South Korean influence on its citizens. The piece said that the state’s thought and spirit are reflected in clothing, hairstyles, and language. The piece said that North Korean youth must stick to the language used in Pyongyang that is deemed “superior.”
The editorial went on to further say that losing the culture war would bring consequences that are more serious compared to the conflict in war. Kim Jong Un’s regime has since resorted to stricter penalties on North Koreans who are caught consuming South Korean culture. The death penalty is included in the possible punishment.
Previously, North Korea’s foreign ministry published a rebuke of US humanitarian aid on an official website. Senior researcher Kang Hyon Cheol, who is from the ministry-affiliated Promotion of International Economic and Technological Exchange, cited that humanitarian aid has a direct correlation to the foreign policy goals of the US or its pressure on human rights issues.
“This vividly reveals that the American ulterior intention of linking ‘humanitarian assistance’ with ‘human rights issue’ is to legitimize their pressure on the sovereign states and achieve their sinister political scheme,” wrote Kang. Kang also cited the recent withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan as an example.


DOJ Rescinds Anti-Weaponization Fund Ahead of Todd Blanche Senate Confirmation Vote
Russian Border Drone Strike Kills Child in Belgorod, Injures Two Others
25 Democratic-Led States Sue Trump Administration Over New Global Tariffs
Trump Urges Exxon, Chevron to Cut Gas Prices After Record Oil Profits
Ukraine Protests Grow Over Zelensky’s Dismissal of Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov
Israel Strikes Gaza Near Hospital as Uncertainty Grows Over Hamas Disarmament Deal
US State Department Plans to Close Five Foreign Missions in Global Diplomatic Restructuring
White House: No Weaponized Drones Seized at FIFA World Cup Venues Despite 700 Recoveries
Trump-Backed Russia Sanctions Bill Faces House Hurdles Over Tariff Powers
Spain Installs Floating Barrier as Ceuta Migrant Crossings Halt After Deadly Surge
US Embassies Urge Americans to Leave Middle East as Iran Tensions Escalate
China Defends Industrial Policy Ahead of Key U.S. and EU Trade Talks
Brown University President Christina Paxson to Step Down After Clashes With Trump Administration
Capital One Says AML Review Led to Closure of Trump Organization Accounts
Israel Strikes Gaza as Trump Ceasefire Push Faces Fresh Challenges 



