Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Indian Refiners Scale Back Russian Oil Imports as U.S.-India Trade Deal Advances 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
Taiwan Says Moving 40% of Semiconductor Production to the U.S. Is Impossible 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
DBS Expects Slight Dip in 2026 Net Profit After Q4 Earnings Miss on Lower Interest Margins 
Samsung Electronics Shares Jump on HBM4 Mass Production Report 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
NEW YORK, Sept. 23, 2016 -- The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the USDC for the District of Minnesota on behalf of investors who purchased Polaris Industries Inc. (NYSE:PII) securities between January 26, 2016 and September 11, 2016.
Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/polaris-industries-inc. There is no cost or obligation to you.
According to the complaint, during the Class Period, Polaris made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Polaris was unable to sufficiently validate the initially identified repair for certain of its recalled RZR vehicles; (2) that the Company would ultimately need to implement a more complex and expensive repair solution; (3) that the financial impact of RZR vehicle recalls was greater than the Company had disclosed to investors; (4) that Polaris overstated its full-year 2016 guidance.
Polaris announced multiple recalls for numerous vehicles in 2015 and 2016. Then in July 2016, Polaris issued a stop-ride/stop-sale advisory pending the recall of another vehicle, citing fire hazards. Then on September 12, 2016, Polaris lowered its earnings guidance range for the full year 2016 from $6.00 per share to between $3.30 and $3.80 per share.
If you suffered a loss in Polaris Industries you have until November 15, 2016 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected], by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/polaris-industries-inc.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT: Vincent Wong, Esq. 39 East Broadway Suite 304 New York, NY 10002 Tel. 212.425.1140 Fax. 866.699.3880 E-Mail: [email protected]
