Tesla shareholders are set to appear in court to dispute a $1.44 billion attorney fee request related to CEO Elon Musk's invalidated $56 billion compensation plan. The fee demand, initially $7.2 billion, has sparked significant controversy among investors.
Tesla Shareholders Challenge $7.2 Billion Legal Fee Request Following Invalidation of Musk’s Compensation Plan
As part of the case in which a Delaware judge invalidated CEO Elon Musk's $56 billion compensation plan earlier this year, Tesla shareholders are scheduled to appear in court this week to contest counsel requests for billions in legal fees.
In January, Delaware Judge Kathaleen McCormick invalidated Musk's compensation plan from 2018, which shareholders had previously authorized. This decision was made as part of a case with shareholder Richard Tornetta. Tornetta's attorneys, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, and two other law firms, subsequently requested approximately 29 million Tesla shares as legal fees, valued at roughly $7.2 billion at Tesla's Friday stock price.
According to a report from Reuters, Tesla shareholders are scheduled to attend a court hearing on July 8 to contest the attorney fees. As detailed in court documents, the initial fee requests represented a record-high legal fee demand, bringing pay rates to approximately $370,000 per hour for all 37 attorneys and other professionals involved.
“The legal fees appear exceedingly disproportionate and outlandish,” wrote Nathan Chiu, a New Jersey-based shareholder, to Judge McCormick in a March filing.
Tesla Shareholders, Including Major Funds, Object to $1.44 Billion Legal Fee Request in Court
According to court documents, the California Public Employees' Retirement System and over 8,000 Tesla shareholders are among the other shareholders who have submitted over 1,500 letters and objections to the fee.
Teslarati reported that the legal team's request was reduced to $1.44 billion last month, equating to over $200,000 per hour of labor on the case. Court documents also indicate that confident case attorneys, associates, and paralegals typically charge as little as $275 per hour.
The case involving Tornetta, who held nine Tesla shares at the time of the initial litigation in 2018, commenced in 2022 and concluded in January when McCormick ruled in favor of the shareholder.
Musk described the request as "criminal," "ironic," and "utterly disgraceful" in March following the initial reports about the fee. He also referred to the attorneys as "evil" twice.
Last month, Tesla shareholders ratified the previously authorized compensation plan and voted to relocate the company's incorporation from Delaware to Texas.
Photo: Microsoft Bing


Elliott Management Takes $1 Billion Stake in Lululemon, Pushes for Leadership Change
Apple Opens iPhone to Alternative App Stores in Japan Under New Competition Law
Oracle Stock Slides After Blue Owl Exit Report, Company Says Michigan Data Center Talks Remain on Track
MetaX IPO Soars as China’s AI Chip Stocks Ignite Investor Frenzy
Apple Explores India for iPhone Chip Assembly as Manufacturing Push Accelerates
Instacart Stock Drops After FTC Probes AI-Based Price Discrimination Claims
Biren Technology Targets Hong Kong IPO to Raise $300 Million Amid China’s AI Chip Push
OpenAI Explores Massive Funding Round at $750 Billion Valuation
Trump Signs Executive Order to Establish National AI Regulation Standard
SoftBank Shares Slide as Oracle’s AI Spending Plans Fuel Market Jitters
Micron Technology Forecasts Surge in Revenue and Earnings on AI-Driven Memory Demand
Sanofi’s Efdoralprin Alfa Gains EMA Orphan Status for Rare Lung Disease
Amazon in Talks to Invest $10 Billion in OpenAI as AI Firm Eyes $1 Trillion IPO Valuation
SUPERFORTUNE Launches AI-Powered Mobile App, Expanding Beyond Web3 Into $392 Billion Metaphysics Market
SpaceX Edges Toward Landmark IPO as Elon Musk Confirms Plans
Blackstone Leads $400 Million Funding Round in Cyera at $9 Billion Valuation 



