Tesla shareholders are set to appear in court to dispute a $1.44 billion attorney fee request related to CEO Elon Musk's invalidated $56 billion compensation plan. The fee demand, initially $7.2 billion, has sparked significant controversy among investors.
Tesla Shareholders Challenge $7.2 Billion Legal Fee Request Following Invalidation of Musk’s Compensation Plan
As part of the case in which a Delaware judge invalidated CEO Elon Musk's $56 billion compensation plan earlier this year, Tesla shareholders are scheduled to appear in court this week to contest counsel requests for billions in legal fees.
In January, Delaware Judge Kathaleen McCormick invalidated Musk's compensation plan from 2018, which shareholders had previously authorized. This decision was made as part of a case with shareholder Richard Tornetta. Tornetta's attorneys, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, and two other law firms, subsequently requested approximately 29 million Tesla shares as legal fees, valued at roughly $7.2 billion at Tesla's Friday stock price.
According to a report from Reuters, Tesla shareholders are scheduled to attend a court hearing on July 8 to contest the attorney fees. As detailed in court documents, the initial fee requests represented a record-high legal fee demand, bringing pay rates to approximately $370,000 per hour for all 37 attorneys and other professionals involved.
“The legal fees appear exceedingly disproportionate and outlandish,” wrote Nathan Chiu, a New Jersey-based shareholder, to Judge McCormick in a March filing.
Tesla Shareholders, Including Major Funds, Object to $1.44 Billion Legal Fee Request in Court
According to court documents, the California Public Employees' Retirement System and over 8,000 Tesla shareholders are among the other shareholders who have submitted over 1,500 letters and objections to the fee.
Teslarati reported that the legal team's request was reduced to $1.44 billion last month, equating to over $200,000 per hour of labor on the case. Court documents also indicate that confident case attorneys, associates, and paralegals typically charge as little as $275 per hour.
The case involving Tornetta, who held nine Tesla shares at the time of the initial litigation in 2018, commenced in 2022 and concluded in January when McCormick ruled in favor of the shareholder.
Musk described the request as "criminal," "ironic," and "utterly disgraceful" in March following the initial reports about the fee. He also referred to the attorneys as "evil" twice.
Last month, Tesla shareholders ratified the previously authorized compensation plan and voted to relocate the company's incorporation from Delaware to Texas.
Photo: Microsoft Bing


Flare, Xaman Roll Out One-Click DeFi Vault for XRP Yield via XRPL Wallets
Apple to Begin Mac Mini Production in Texas Amid $600 Billion U.S. Investment Plan
Greg Abel’s First Berkshire Hathaway Shareholder Letter Signals Continuity, Caution, and Capital Discipline
Netflix Stock Jumps 14% After Exiting Warner Bros Deal as Paramount Seals $110 Billion Acquisition
Samsung Electronics Stock Poised for $1 Trillion Valuation Amid AI and Memory Boom
OpenAI Pentagon AI Contract Adds Safeguards Amid Anthropic Dispute
Snowflake Forecasts Strong Fiscal 2027 Revenue Growth as Enterprise AI Demand Surges
Nvidia Earnings Beat Expectations as AI Demand Surges, Stock Rises on Strong Revenue Outlook
Microsoft Gaming Leadership Shake-Up: Phil Spencer Retires, Asha Sharma Named New Xbox CEO
FedEx Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Tariff Refunds After Supreme Court Ruling
Nvidia Earnings Preview: AI Growth Outlook Remains Strong Beyond 2026
Amazon’s $50B OpenAI Investment Tied to AGI Milestone and IPO Plans
Synopsys Q2 Revenue Forecast Misses Expectations Amid China Export Curbs and AI Shift
OpenAI Hires Former Meta and Apple AI Leader Ruomin Pang Amid Intensifying AI Talent War
APEX Tech Acquisition Inc. Raises $111.97 Million in NYSE IPO Under Ticker TRADU
Pentagon Weighs Supply Chain Risk Designation for Anthropic Over Claude AI Use 



