Tesla shareholders are set to appear in court to dispute a $1.44 billion attorney fee request related to CEO Elon Musk's invalidated $56 billion compensation plan. The fee demand, initially $7.2 billion, has sparked significant controversy among investors.
Tesla Shareholders Challenge $7.2 Billion Legal Fee Request Following Invalidation of Musk’s Compensation Plan
As part of the case in which a Delaware judge invalidated CEO Elon Musk's $56 billion compensation plan earlier this year, Tesla shareholders are scheduled to appear in court this week to contest counsel requests for billions in legal fees.
In January, Delaware Judge Kathaleen McCormick invalidated Musk's compensation plan from 2018, which shareholders had previously authorized. This decision was made as part of a case with shareholder Richard Tornetta. Tornetta's attorneys, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, and two other law firms, subsequently requested approximately 29 million Tesla shares as legal fees, valued at roughly $7.2 billion at Tesla's Friday stock price.
According to a report from Reuters, Tesla shareholders are scheduled to attend a court hearing on July 8 to contest the attorney fees. As detailed in court documents, the initial fee requests represented a record-high legal fee demand, bringing pay rates to approximately $370,000 per hour for all 37 attorneys and other professionals involved.
“The legal fees appear exceedingly disproportionate and outlandish,” wrote Nathan Chiu, a New Jersey-based shareholder, to Judge McCormick in a March filing.
Tesla Shareholders, Including Major Funds, Object to $1.44 Billion Legal Fee Request in Court
According to court documents, the California Public Employees' Retirement System and over 8,000 Tesla shareholders are among the other shareholders who have submitted over 1,500 letters and objections to the fee.
Teslarati reported that the legal team's request was reduced to $1.44 billion last month, equating to over $200,000 per hour of labor on the case. Court documents also indicate that confident case attorneys, associates, and paralegals typically charge as little as $275 per hour.
The case involving Tornetta, who held nine Tesla shares at the time of the initial litigation in 2018, commenced in 2022 and concluded in January when McCormick ruled in favor of the shareholder.
Musk described the request as "criminal," "ironic," and "utterly disgraceful" in March following the initial reports about the fee. He also referred to the attorneys as "evil" twice.
Last month, Tesla shareholders ratified the previously authorized compensation plan and voted to relocate the company's incorporation from Delaware to Texas.
Photo: Microsoft Bing


Apple Expands iPhone Lineup, Boosts Foldable iPhone Production Plans Through 2027
Baige Online Shares Soar 333% in Hong Kong IPO Debut as AI Insurance Demand Lifts Chinese Listings
Northern Star Appoints New CEO as Activist Elliott Pushes for Leadership Overhaul
Morgan Stanley Raises Tesla Q2 Delivery Forecast on Strong Europe and China Demand
South Korea Alleges Google Abused Android App Store Dominance, Eyes Major Fine
Australia Sues Amazon Over Prime Video Ads and Subscription Terms
Open-Source AI Models Gain Ground as Enterprises Seek Lower-Cost Alternatives, Citi Says
Sodexo Raises 2026 Revenue Outlook After Strong Q3 Sales Beat
Microsoft Reportedly Plans New Job Cuts Across Sales, Consulting, and Xbox
Samsung to Invest $90 Billion in South Korea to Expand AI Chip, Display, and Battery Production
OpenAI Proposes 5% U.S. Government Stake Amid AI Policy Talks
Trump Reports $1.4 Billion in Crypto Income as Digital Assets Become Top Wealth Source
Anthropic Restores Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 After U.S. Lifts AI Export Controls
EU Chip Industry Faces Growing Risks From China Export Controls and U.S. Technology Dependence: Report
Nvidia Stock Rises as SemiAnalysis Sees AI Data Center Revenue Beating Wall Street Forecasts
Anthropic Brings Claude AI Models to Microsoft Azure Foundry With NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs 



