The Greater Idaho Movement, a campaign advocating for eastern and central counties of Oregon to secede and join Idaho, has formally requested support from President-elect Donald Trump. The group’s letter emphasized strong local backing for Trump in these regions and appealed for his assistance in addressing what they describe as a lack of representative government.

Thirteen Oregon counties have already voted to leave the state, with the most recent, Crook County, making its decision in May 2024. The movement aims to include nearly two-thirds of eastern Oregon in Idaho’s borders, citing political and cultural disparities with the state’s liberal-leaning urban centers, such as Portland and Salem.

The letter, signed by the movement’s leaders, highlighted frustrations with a state government controlled by Democrats since 2007. It argued that eastern Oregon’s predominantly conservative residents feel marginalized in the current political landscape.

Challenges in Changing State Borders

While the Greater Idaho Movement has garnered support in rural counties, merging portions of Oregon into Idaho faces significant legal and logistical hurdles. Approval would be required from both states’ legislatures and the U.S. Congress. Advocates argue the move would bring better representation to eastern Oregonians, but critics have raised concerns about the practicality and implications of such a shift.

Idaho Governor Brad Little has expressed understanding for the movement’s motivations, pointing to Idaho’s strong economy and values. However, he acknowledged the substantial legislative steps required to redefine state borders, suggesting that realizing this proposal is far from imminent.

Opposition to the Greater Idaho project has also emerged, with groups like the Portland-based Western State Center voicing concerns. Critics warn of potential ties to extremist ideologies, though there is no verified evidence linking the movement’s leadership to such affiliations. These accusations have added a layer of controversy to the debate.

Public Reactions Highlight Divided Opinions

The Greater Idaho Movement has sparked mixed reactions, with supporters praising its potential to improve representation and critics questioning its feasibility. On social media, opinions range from enthusiastic endorsements to sharp critiques:

• @RuralRoots: "Finally, a solution that gives eastern Oregon a voice. This is long overdue!"
• @IdahoStrong: "Idaho welcomes anyone who shares our values. Let’s make this happen."
• @CityLiberal: "This is a waste of resources and an attempt to run from democracy."
• @BorderLogic: "Changing state borders isn’t practical. Too much bureaucracy for too little benefit."
• @FairVoteUSA: "Representation matters, but this isn’t the way. Oregon’s leaders need to address these concerns locally."
• @UniteNorthwest: "We need unity, not division. This idea creates more problems than it solves."