The Trump administration is facing strong backlash from China hawks and Democratic lawmakers after authorizing Nvidia, AMD, and Intel to sell advanced AI chips—specifically Nvidia’s H200—to China. President Donald Trump announced the decision on social media, noting that the U.S. would collect a 25% fee on each sale. Critics argue the move could give Beijing access to technology capable of accelerating its military AI programs.
Brad Carson, former Under Secretary of the Army, warned that the policy “puts our competitive edge up for sale,” emphasizing that China could eventually integrate U.S.-made AI chips into its military systems. Many national security officials see the authorization as a major strategic risk at a time when U.S.–China technological competition is intensifying.
This policy represents a dramatic departure from Trump’s first term, when he aggressively restricted Chinese access to key U.S. technologies, citing intellectual property theft and military concerns. The current administration, guided by White House AI czar David Sacks, argues that allowing controlled chip sales may actually slow the rise of Chinese competitors like Huawei. Sacks claims that if Chinese-designed AI chips dominate global markets within a few years, it would signal a major loss for American leadership.
However, former NSA and Homeland Security official Stewart Baker called that logic unrealistic, stating China will never stop pursuing a fully domestic AI chip industry. Democratic lawmakers echoed the criticism. Senator Ron Wyden accused Trump of being “taken to the cleaners by China yet again,” while Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi labeled the decision “a profound national security mistake.”
China responded by urging the U.S. to maintain stable supply chains, with embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu expressing hope for constructive actions from Washington. Some analysts, including Chinese military expert James Mulvenon, believe any short-term benefits for China will be temporary, as Beijing’s long-term strategy is to eliminate reliance on Western technology.
The debate underscores growing tension between economic strategy, national security, and technological dominance as the United States navigates its evolving relationship with China.


Trump Signals He May Influence Netflix–Warner Bros Merger Decision
US Charges Two Men in Alleged Nvidia Chip Smuggling Scheme to China
U.S.-EU Tensions Rise After $140 Million Fine on Elon Musk’s X Platform
Trump Administration Fuel-Efficiency Rollback Could Raise Long-Term Costs for U.S. Drivers
U.S. Greenlights Nvidia H200 Chip Exports to China With 25% Fee
Ben & Jerry’s Board Chair Rejects Unilever Pressure Ahead of Magnum Spinoff
Adobe Strengthens AI Strategy Ahead of Q4 Earnings, Says Stifel
Supreme Court to Weigh Trump’s Power to Remove FTC Commissioner
Trump Administration Halts Immigration, Green Card, and Citizenship Processing for 19 Countries
BHP Secures $2 Billion Investment from BlackRock’s GIP to Boost WAIO Power Network
Malaysia Airlines Ordered to Compensate Families of MH370 Passengers
SpaceX Reportedly Preparing Record-Breaking IPO Targeting $1.5 Trillion Valuation
U.S. Military Bill Seeks to End Dependence on China for Display Technology by 2030
DOJ Sues Loudoun County School Board Over Transgender Locker Room Policy
Taiwan Opposition Criticizes Plan to Block Chinese App Rednote Over Security Concerns
Trump Administration to Secure Equity Stake in Pat Gelsinger’s XLight Startup
California Launches Portal for Reporting Alleged Misconduct by Federal Immigration Agents 



