Menu

Search

  |   Politics

Menu

  |   Politics

Search

U.S. Diplomats Ordered to Avoid Commenting on Foreign Election Legitimacy

U.S. Diplomats Ordered to Avoid Commenting on Foreign Election Legitimacy. Source: U.S. Department of State, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has directed American diplomats worldwide to refrain from commenting on the fairness or legitimacy of foreign elections, marking a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy. In a July 17 internal State Department cable obtained by Reuters, Rubio emphasized that the U.S. will no longer issue statements or social media posts on foreign elections unless there's a “clear and compelling” national interest.

The cable, labeled "sensitive," instructs diplomats to focus solely on congratulating winning candidates and highlighting shared foreign policy interests. It bars comments on the democratic integrity or legitimacy of elections and prohibits any such messages without prior approval from senior leadership. Only the Secretary of State or the Department spokesperson is authorized to make election-related remarks.

This directive aligns with President Donald Trump's May 13 speech in Riyadh, where he criticized Western interference in Middle Eastern governance and pledged to prioritize strategic partnerships over democracy promotion. The administration maintains it will uphold U.S. democratic values but will no longer impose them abroad.

A State Department spokesperson confirmed the approach is consistent with Trump’s focus on national sovereignty. Critics argue this move further distances the U.S. from its long-standing role in promoting human rights and democratic standards, especially amid ongoing restructuring of the State Department’s human rights bureau.

While the administration has refrained from criticizing flawed elections abroad, it has selectively supported right-wing figures in Europe, accusing governments in France, Germany, and Romania of suppressing dissent, particularly around anti-immigration stances. This marks a broader ideological pivot from traditional U.S. diplomacy toward a more transactional and nationalist foreign policy model.

  • Market Data
Close

Welcome to EconoTimes

Sign up for daily updates for the most important
stories unfolding in the global economy.