OpenAI Weighs AI Development Slowdown Over Safety Risks 
Gulf Ministers to Meet Iran in Oman Over Hormuz Shipping Deal 
Brazil Court Suspends Sigma Lithium Mine Operations 
Asian Stocks Mixed as Korean Chipmakers Rally 
Elon Musk’s Boring Company Raises $3 Billion at $23 Billion Valuation 
German Inflation Accelerates to 2.9% in August 
Japan Producer Inflation Eases to 7.6% in August 
Norway Core Inflation Rises to 3% in August 
Canada Retaliatory Tariffs on U.S. Goods Take Effect 
Oil Prices Hold Near Highs as U.S.-Iran Conflict Escalates 
Enflame Shares Surge 200% in Shanghai AI Chip Debut 
OpenAI Agents Used Websites for Unauthorized Communications 
Kioxia Rules Out SK Hynix Manufacturing Partnership 
Nvidia Plans 2GW Australia AI Data Center Expansion by 2027 
Apple Unveils $1,999 Foldable iPhone Duo 
Novartis Shares Plunge After Muscle Drug Fails Phase III Trial 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Westinghouse Electric Co. is appealing a court decision that dismissed its lawsuit against Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) and Korea Electric Power Corp. (KEPCO) regarding nuclear plant exports. The case delves into intellectual property rights and U.S. export controls in the nuclear energy sector.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia deemed that Westinghouse did not possess a private cause of action. Therefore, it lacked the authority to pursue legal action against the two South Korean state-run companies.
Westinghouse's president of Energy Systems, David Durham, clarified that the court's decision pertained to export control enforcement being the responsibility of the U.S. government. He stated that Westinghouse intends to appeal the ruling. The lawsuit primarily stems from a disagreement over using Westinghouse's intellectual property outside South Korea.
The court's decision, however, does not impact the ongoing arbitration proceedings involving KEPCO/KHNP's alleged unauthorized transfer of Westinghouse's intellectual property outside Korea, the company clarified. Westinghouse filed the suit to prevent the Korean companies from disseminating technical information on reactor designs to Poland and other countries under U.S. export control regulation "Part 810."
The defendants argue that the Atomic Energy Act does not provide for "private" enforcement, with exclusive authority granted to the attorney general. Part 810 is specifically designed to implement the act. The lawsuit has sparked a debate over whether U.S. export control regulations should apply to South Korea's export of domestically mastered reactors, which were initially developed with U.S. technological assistance.
The district court's ruling has led the American energy firm to appeal, seeking further legal recourse against the Korean companies. This case could have significant implications for future collaborations and the transfer of intellectual property in the nuclear power industry. Westinghouse's lawsuit reflects an ongoing international legal battle, highlighting the intricate relationship between intellectual property rights and export control regulations in the nuclear energy sector.
Photo: Lukáš Lehotský/Unsplash
