Asian Stocks Mixed as RBA Holds Rates, Oil Risks Rise 
Paramount Weighs CNN Sale as $110B Warner Bros. Discovery Deal Faces Antitrust Fight 
S&P 500, Nasdaq Slip as Oil Jumps on Iran Tensions 
US Judge Dismisses Gautam Adani Criminal Charges 
Gold Price Holds Near $4,400 as Hormuz Risks and CPI Drive Markets 
Berkshire Hathaway Cash Falls as Abel Boosts Stock Buybacks 
Singapore Raises 2026 GDP Growth Forecast as AI Demand Fuels Economy 
Treasury Wine Estates Shares Jump as U.S. Overhaul Lifts FY2026 Outlook 
KOSPI Rebounds 20% as Samsung, SK Hynix Lead South Korea Stock Rally 
Shein Scales Back Vietnam Operations as US Trade Rules Shift 
Goldman Sachs Sees US Stock Buybacks Outpacing Equity Issuance as AI Funding Rises 
Australia Housing Crisis Deepens as Worker Shortages Delay Homebuilding 
Austal Shares Surge 16% as Hanwha Offers Up to $1.2 Billion for U.S. Shipbuilding Business 
Sony, TSMC Eye $6.3 Billion Japan Chip Venture for Next-Gen Image Sensors 
Oil, Gold Rise as Geopolitical Risks Grip Markets Ahead of U.S. CPI 
ANZ Home Loan Applications Drop 12% After Australia Property Tax Changes 
Westinghouse Electric Co. is appealing a court decision that dismissed its lawsuit against Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) and Korea Electric Power Corp. (KEPCO) regarding nuclear plant exports. The case delves into intellectual property rights and U.S. export controls in the nuclear energy sector.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia deemed that Westinghouse did not possess a private cause of action. Therefore, it lacked the authority to pursue legal action against the two South Korean state-run companies.
Westinghouse's president of Energy Systems, David Durham, clarified that the court's decision pertained to export control enforcement being the responsibility of the U.S. government. He stated that Westinghouse intends to appeal the ruling. The lawsuit primarily stems from a disagreement over using Westinghouse's intellectual property outside South Korea.
The court's decision, however, does not impact the ongoing arbitration proceedings involving KEPCO/KHNP's alleged unauthorized transfer of Westinghouse's intellectual property outside Korea, the company clarified. Westinghouse filed the suit to prevent the Korean companies from disseminating technical information on reactor designs to Poland and other countries under U.S. export control regulation "Part 810."
The defendants argue that the Atomic Energy Act does not provide for "private" enforcement, with exclusive authority granted to the attorney general. Part 810 is specifically designed to implement the act. The lawsuit has sparked a debate over whether U.S. export control regulations should apply to South Korea's export of domestically mastered reactors, which were initially developed with U.S. technological assistance.
The district court's ruling has led the American energy firm to appeal, seeking further legal recourse against the Korean companies. This case could have significant implications for future collaborations and the transfer of intellectual property in the nuclear power industry. Westinghouse's lawsuit reflects an ongoing international legal battle, highlighting the intricate relationship between intellectual property rights and export control regulations in the nuclear energy sector.
Photo: Lukáš Lehotský/Unsplash
