AT&T and Verizon are advocating for the FCC to reject SpaceX's Starlink Cellular service, asserting that it would result in substantial network interference and a decline in service quality. The telecommunications titans contend that SpaceX's proposal could undermine their offerings by reducing network downlink throughput by an average of 18%.
AT&T, Verizon Challenge SpaceX’s Starlink Cellular Service, Citing Potential Network Disruption
AT&T and Verizon are urging the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to reject SpaceX's Cellular Starlink service, designed to offer users comprehensive and efficient coverage.
Earlier this month, Verizon and AT&T submitted letters to the FCC asserting that the SpaceX Starlink system would result in network interference, diminishing the effectiveness of their product offerings for customers.
“Specifically, AT&T’s technical analysts show that SpaceX’s proposal would cause an 18% average reduction in network downlink throughput,” AT&T said in a document to the FCC.
PCMag initially reported on the document.
In June, SpaceX pushed to receive a waiver from the FCC to allow Starlink Cellular to operate beyond normal radio frequency parameters. The company said it would prevent interference with other networks despite an increase in radio emissions:
“Moreover, waiving the rule would avoid placing artificial caps on the number of satellites that an operator may use to provide supplemental coverage, which in turn would limit the number of end users that the network could benefit.”
SpaceX Faces Intense Scrutiny from Competitors as FCC Battle Over Starlink Interference Escalates
In a report by Teslarati, SpaceX corroborated its assertions by conducting its investigation in February, which appeared to demonstrate that interference was not a concern. Nevertheless, Verizon and AT&T conducted their investigations, which yielded significantly different conclusions.
Additionally, Verizon stated that:
“SpaceX’s proposal would undermine the Commission’s core goal of protecting incumbent terrestrial licensee operations from SCS satellite operations in adjacent bands by subjecting them to harmful interference.”
These are merely a few of the numerous organizations that have submitted complaints to the FCC regarding interference concerns. However, SpaceX is not ignoring the complaints. The companies are employing every available tactic to delay SpaceX's sanction.
It was stated last week:
“Indeed, each time that SpaceX has demonstrated that it would not cause harmful interference to other operators—often based on those parties’ own claimed assumptions—those competitors have moved the goalposts or have claimed their analysis should not have been trusted in the first place. These operators’ shapeshifting arguments and demands should be seen for what they are: last-minute attempts to block a more advanced supplemental coverage partnership and siphon sensitive information to aid their own competing efforts.”


China vs U.S. AI Race Shifts Toward Robotics and Manufacturing Power in 2026
Samsung Union Confirms 18-Day Strike After Failed Wage Talks
Japan Airlines Signs 10-Year Boeing 787 Maintenance Deal With GE Aerospace
OpenAI Expands Globally with First Overseas AI Lab in Singapore
OpenAI Wins Elon Musk Lawsuit as Jury Rejects Claims Over AI Mission
SpaceX IPO Nears as Goldman Sachs Set to Lead Historic $75 Billion Offering
Google Expands AI Partnership With Singapore Government
SpaceX Delays Starship V3 Launch Ahead of Potential Record IPO
SoftBank Shares Surge as OpenAI IPO Buzz and SB Energy Filing Boost AI Optimism
Stellantis CEO Antonio Filosa to Reveal Turnaround Strategy Focused on U.S. Sales and China Partnerships
X Corp Loses Legal Battle Over Australia Child Safety Fine
Goldman Sachs to Pay $500M in 1MDB Shareholder Fraud Settlement
Texas Sues Meta Over WhatsApp Encryption Claims
H.B. Fuller Eyes Advanced Medical Solutions in Potential £600M Takeover Deal
Anthropic to Brief Financial Stability Board on AI-Driven Cyber Risks 



