Valero Makes First Venezuelan Crude Purchase Under New U.S.-Caracas Deal 
FSU Criticizes ANZ Over Suncorp Bank Job Cuts Amid Post-Acquisition Commitments 
Apple China Holiday Sale Offers Discounts Up to 1,000 Yuan on Popular Devices 
Baidu Shares Surge After Official Launch of Advanced Ernie 5.0 AI Model 
Forex Markets Hold Steady as Traders Await Fed Minutes Amid Thin Year-End Volumes 
Asian Markets End Year on AI Optimism as Precious Metals and Currencies Shine 
South Korea Factory Output Misses Forecasts in November Amid Ongoing Economic Uncertainty 
Valentino Garavani Dies at 93, Leaving Behind the Timeless Legacy of Valentino Red 
U.S. Vaccine Policy Shifts Under RFK Jr. Create Uncertainty for Pharma and Investors 
Memory Chip Shortage Drives Higher Gadget Prices and Weakens Global Tech Demand 
Trump Signs Executive Order to Limit Wall Street Investment in Single-Family Homes 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Plans China Visit Amid AI Chip Market Uncertainty 
U.S. Stock Futures Slip as Year-End Trading Turns Cautious 
Global DRAM Chip Shortage Puts Automakers Under New Cost and Supply Pressure 
Citi Forecasts a Volatile but Ongoing Bull Market for S&P 500 in 2026 
Lululemon Founder Chip Wilson Escalates Proxy Fight to Remove Advent From Board 
Asian Markets Slip as Precious Metals Cool, Geopolitical Tensions Weigh on Sentiment 
Apple Inc. and Masimo Corp. are fighting in court over a patent infringement complaint. The latter sued the iPhone maker for allegedly stealing trade secrets, but the lawsuit ended up with no verdict.
According to Reuters, U.S. District Judge James Selna declared a mistrial in the Apple and Masimo case. The decision comes after the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict in what could have been a billion-dollar lawsuit.
The panel participated in a 3-day deliberation for the case but could not agree. Rather, there was discord as the jury voted 6-1 in favor of Apple. The lone juror would not budge and remain firm with her stand. She refused to change her mind, so there was no verdict in the end.
“We are not going to be able to come to a joint conclusion,” Bloomberg quoted the all-female panel as saying in their final note to the judge.
The Claifornia-based medical device company’s spokesperson said they were disappointed with the outcome with the jury failing to reach a verdict. Masimo said it is planning to file for a retrial of the infringement case against Apple Inc.
On the other hand, Apple also responded by saying it "deeply respects intellectual property and innovation and does not take or use confidential information from other companies." The company will also submit a request for the dismissal of the remaining claims.
The jury started the deliberation on April 26 after a trial that lasted three weeks, with Judge Selna asking the group in federal court in Santa Ana, California, to find out if Apple really misused confidential information from Masimo. The data is about the usage of light to measure biomarkers such as levels of blood oxygen and heart rates.
Masimo and its spinoff firm, Cercacor Laboratories, filed a lawsuit against Apple in 2020. They claimed that the tech company stole trade secrets and applied them to create some of the Apple Watch models. Masimo is asking for over $1.8 billion in compensation for damages. It originally requested $3.1 billion, but the judge dismissed some of the claims thus, the amount was reduced.
Photo by: Daniel Korpai/Unsplash
