NEW YORK, Oct. 21, 2016 -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (“Pilgrim’s Pride” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq:PPC) in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Pilgrim’s Pride between February 21, 2014 and October 6, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”), seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
According to the Complaint, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Pilgrim’s Pride systematically colluded with several of its industry peers to fix prices in the market for broiler chickens (i.e., chickens raised specifically for meat production); (ii) the foregoing conduct constituted a violation of federal antitrust laws; (iii) consequently, Pilgrim’s Pride’s revenues during the class period were the result of illegal conduct; and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, Pilgrim’s Pride’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
On September 2, 2016, food distributor Maplevale Farms, Inc. filed an antitrust lawsuit against Pilgrim’s Pride and other poultry producers, including Tyson Foods, Inc. (“Tyson”), alleging that Pilgrim’s Pride and the other companies named in the complaint had conspired since 2008 to manipulate the prices of broiler chickens. Additionally, on October 7, 2016, Pivotal Research downgraded Tyson from “Hold” to “Sell.” Explaining the downgrade, analyst Timothy Ramey directed investors’ attention to the allegations of price manipulation by Pilgrim’s Pride, Tyson, and their industry peers and described the lawsuit as “powerfully convincing.”
On this news, the Company’s share price fell from $21.11 per share on October 6, 2016 to a closing price of $20.16 on October 7, 2016—a $0.95 or a 4.5% drop.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than December 19, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.


Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
Indian Refiners Scale Back Russian Oil Imports as U.S.-India Trade Deal Advances
Anta Sports Expands Global Footprint With Strategic Puma Stake
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine
DBS Expects Slight Dip in 2026 Net Profit After Q4 Earnings Miss on Lower Interest Margins 



