NEW YORK, Oct. 21, 2016 -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (“Pilgrim’s Pride” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq:PPC) in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Pilgrim’s Pride between February 21, 2014 and October 6, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”), seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
According to the Complaint, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Pilgrim’s Pride systematically colluded with several of its industry peers to fix prices in the market for broiler chickens (i.e., chickens raised specifically for meat production); (ii) the foregoing conduct constituted a violation of federal antitrust laws; (iii) consequently, Pilgrim’s Pride’s revenues during the class period were the result of illegal conduct; and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, Pilgrim’s Pride’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
On September 2, 2016, food distributor Maplevale Farms, Inc. filed an antitrust lawsuit against Pilgrim’s Pride and other poultry producers, including Tyson Foods, Inc. (“Tyson”), alleging that Pilgrim’s Pride and the other companies named in the complaint had conspired since 2008 to manipulate the prices of broiler chickens. Additionally, on October 7, 2016, Pivotal Research downgraded Tyson from “Hold” to “Sell.” Explaining the downgrade, analyst Timothy Ramey directed investors’ attention to the allegations of price manipulation by Pilgrim’s Pride, Tyson, and their industry peers and described the lawsuit as “powerfully convincing.”
On this news, the Company’s share price fell from $21.11 per share on October 6, 2016 to a closing price of $20.16 on October 7, 2016—a $0.95 or a 4.5% drop.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than December 19, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.


Bill Ackman Eyes New Fund to Bet Against Market Complacency
China's AI Stocks Surge as Zhipu and MiniMax Hit Record Highs
Pony.ai, Uber, and Verne Launch Europe's First Commercial Robotaxi Service in Zagreb
Disney Plans to Cut 1,000 Jobs Amid Ongoing Restructuring Efforts
OpenAI Executive Shake-Up Ahead of Anticipated 2026 IPO
BHP's Incoming CEO Visits China Amid Pricing Dispute with CMRG
Alibaba Shares Slide as Jefferies Slashes Price Target Over AI Spending and Business Losses
UPS and Teamsters Reach Agreement to Limit Driver Severance Program
Deere & Company Agrees to $99 Million Settlement Over Right-to-Repair Dispute
Anthropic's Mythos AI Model Sparks Emergency Cybersecurity Meeting With Top U.S. Bank CEOs
Abbott Laboratories Ordered to Pay $53 Million in Premature Infant Formula Lawsuit
Foreign Investors Pour $18.65 Billion into Japanese Stocks Amid Market Stabilization
Chalco Stock Surges as Q1 2025 Profit Forecast Jumps Up to 58%
Ford Issues Major Recall on Over 422,000 Vehicles Due to Windshield Wiper Defect
Kia Cuts EV Sales Target for 2030 Amid Slowing Demand and U.S. Policy Shifts
Samsung Electronics Eyes Record Q1 Profit Amid AI-Driven Chip Boom 



