Lumentum Holdings Rides AI Wave With Order Book Filled Through 2028 
China Vanke Seeks Bond Extension Amid Mounting Debt Crisis 
Pershing Square Bids €30.40 Per Share to Acquire Universal Music Group in $9.4B Deal 
SanDisk Joins Nasdaq-100, Replacing Atlassian on April 20 
Anthropic's Mythos AI Model Sparks Emergency Cybersecurity Meeting With Top U.S. Bank CEOs 
MATCH Act: How New U.S. Chip Legislation Could Freeze China's Semiconductor Ambitions 
Foreign Investors Pour $18.65 Billion into Japanese Stocks Amid Market Stabilization 
Kia Cuts EV Sales Target for 2030 Amid Slowing Demand and U.S. Policy Shifts 
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Posts Strong Q3 Earnings, Announces AI-Driven Job Cuts 
Rio Tinto's California Boron Assets Attract Over a Dozen Bidders, Valued at Up to $2 Billion 
Anthropic Fights Pentagon Blacklisting in Dual Federal Court Battles 
NIO ES9 SUV Launch Sends HK Shares Down 7% Despite Bold Pricing Strategy 
Ford Issues Major Recall on Over 422,000 Vehicles Due to Windshield Wiper Defect 
Alibaba Shares Slide as Jefferies Slashes Price Target Over AI Spending and Business Losses 
Goldman Sachs, ANZ Cut Oil Forecasts Amid U.S.-Iran Ceasefire Hopes 
FedEx Pilots and Union Reach Tentative Agreement on 40% Pay Increase 
IRVINE, Calif., Aug. 23, 2017 -- Khang & Khang LLP (the “Firm”) announces a securities class action lawsuit against Lexmark International Inc. (“Lexmark” or the “Company”) (NYSE: LXK). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Lexmark shares between August 1, 2014 and July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the Firm in advance of the September 19, 2017 lead plaintiff motion deadline.
If you purchased Lexmark shares during the Class Period, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esq., of Khang & Khang LLP, 4000 Barranca Parkway, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92604, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or by e-mail at [email protected].
There has been no class certification in this case yet. Until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. You may choose to take no action and remain a passive class member as well.
The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Lexmark made materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failed to disclose, that: end-user demand and growth for the Company’s supplies business was deteriorating; that pricing increases were the primary driver of supplies revenue growth, not end-user demand; that customers in the supplies channel reacted by buying ahead of anticipated pricing increases; and that as a result, there were excessive inventory levels at its European wholesale distributors.
On July 21, 2015, Lexmark reported poor results for its second quarter ending June 30, 2015 and lowered its 2015 sales guidance. The Company revealed its supplies growth was not attributable to end-user demand but rather the result of its European customers buying ahead of customary price increases which produced excessive inventory. Following this news, Lexmark’s stock price dropped materially, which caused investors harm according to the Complaint.
If you wish to learn more about this lawsuit, or if you have any questions concerning this notice or your rights, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esquire, a prominent litigator for almost two decades, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or via e-mail at [email protected].
This press release may constitute Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions.
Contact Joon M. Khang, Esq. Telephone: 949-419-3834 Facsimile: 949-225-4474 [email protected]
