NRW Holdings Shares Surge After Securing Major Rio Tinto Contract and New Project Wins 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Australian Scandium Project Backed by Richard Friedland Poised to Support U.S. Critical Minerals Stockpile 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling 
Nintendo Shares Slide After Earnings Miss Raises Switch 2 Margin Concerns 
Novo Nordisk Warns of Profit Decline as Wegovy Faces U.S. Price Pressure and Rising Competition 
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026 
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
Qantas to Sell Jetstar Japan Stake as It Refocuses on Core Australian Operations 
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links 
Boeing Signals Progress on Delayed 777X Program With Planned April First Flight 
IRVINE, Calif., Aug. 23, 2017 -- Khang & Khang LLP (the “Firm”) announces a securities class action lawsuit against Lexmark International Inc. (“Lexmark” or the “Company”) (NYSE: LXK). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Lexmark shares between August 1, 2014 and July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the Firm in advance of the September 19, 2017 lead plaintiff motion deadline.
If you purchased Lexmark shares during the Class Period, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esq., of Khang & Khang LLP, 4000 Barranca Parkway, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92604, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or by e-mail at [email protected].
There has been no class certification in this case yet. Until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. You may choose to take no action and remain a passive class member as well.
The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Lexmark made materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failed to disclose, that: end-user demand and growth for the Company’s supplies business was deteriorating; that pricing increases were the primary driver of supplies revenue growth, not end-user demand; that customers in the supplies channel reacted by buying ahead of anticipated pricing increases; and that as a result, there were excessive inventory levels at its European wholesale distributors.
On July 21, 2015, Lexmark reported poor results for its second quarter ending June 30, 2015 and lowered its 2015 sales guidance. The Company revealed its supplies growth was not attributable to end-user demand but rather the result of its European customers buying ahead of customary price increases which produced excessive inventory. Following this news, Lexmark’s stock price dropped materially, which caused investors harm according to the Complaint.
If you wish to learn more about this lawsuit, or if you have any questions concerning this notice or your rights, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esquire, a prominent litigator for almost two decades, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or via e-mail at [email protected].
This press release may constitute Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions.
Contact Joon M. Khang, Esq. Telephone: 949-419-3834 Facsimile: 949-225-4474 [email protected]
