West Virginia Democratic Senator Joe Manchin is one of the two holdouts of the caucus in an evenly divided Senate, in both the filibuster and the Build Back Better bill. Manchin continued his staunch defense of the Senate rule with a claim that many experts have refuted.
Manchin recently made a claim about the Senate filibuster according to Chad Pergram of Fox News. The West Virginia Senator was quoted as saying that the Senate tradition has continued for 232 years. Manchin said that the Senate needs to be careful on what is done about the filibuster, which currently requires 60 votes in order to pass legislation, with the exception of presidential nominees and Supreme Court justices.
To note, the 60-vote rule was implemented in 1975, and not when the US Constitution was first put in place.
Legal experts criticized Manchin’s claim. Attorney Max Kennerly took to social media to refute Manchin’s claim, noting that a simple majority was used in Senate debates back in 1790 and pointed out that the rule that Manchin is defending did not exist until the 1970s. Kennerly also pointed out that many exceptions to the filibuster have been made over time, including an exception made in December 2021.
Jonathan Chait of New York Magazine also refuted Manchin’s claim, saying that the filibuster does not exist in the US Constitution, and that “the Founders considered, rejected, a routine supermajority requirement.”
MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan also weighed in on Manchin’s claim, describing it as a “Trumpian lie.”
“Anybody notice that the filibuster rule was changed to allow the debt ceiling to be raised with just 51 votes? So why can’t the filibuster rule be changed to allow the passage of voting rights by just 51 votes? Manchin – Holdout in Chief – are you listening?” tweeted attorney, economist, and former Labor Secretary Robert Reich.
Manchin has maintained his opposition to the Build Back Better bill and has previously faced backlash for his public announcement citing his opposition to the legislation. This includes his own colleagues, like Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders. Back in December, speaking on MSNBC, Sanders criticized the West Virginia lawmaker’s arrogance, citing that his constituents in West Virginia are in need of the provisions laid out in the proposal.


UAE Plans Temporary Housing Complex for Displaced Palestinians in Southern Gaza
NATO to Discuss Strengthening Greenland Security Amid Arctic Tensions
New York Legalizes Medical Aid in Dying for Terminally Ill Patients
U.S. Sanctions on Russia Could Expand as Ukraine Peace Talks Continue, Says Treasury Secretary Bessent
U.S. to Begin Paying UN Dues as Financial Crisis Spurs Push for Reforms
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters
TrumpRx.gov Highlights GLP-1 Drug Discounts but Offers Limited Savings for Most Americans
Pentagon Ends Military Education Programs With Harvard University
U.S. Announces Additional $6 Million in Humanitarian Aid to Cuba Amid Oil Sanctions and Fuel Shortages
Trump Allegedly Sought Airport, Penn Station Renaming in Exchange for Hudson River Tunnel Funding
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
Trump Says “Very Good Talks” Underway on Russia-Ukraine War as Peace Efforts Continue
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
Ukraine-Russia Talks Yield Major POW Swap as U.S. Pushes for Path to Peace
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business 



