A federal judge has halted the Trump administration’s plan to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and revoke work permits for more than 6,100 Syrian nationals living in the United States. The ruling, issued by U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan, prevents the policy from taking effect while a legal challenge moves forward.
Judge Failla determined that the sudden termination of TPS for Syrians was likely unlawful. She agreed with seven Syrian migrants who argued that the administration failed to follow mandatory procedures, including a thorough review of current conditions in Syria. Failla noted that evidence suggested political motivations influenced the decision rather than the humanitarian and legal criteria required by federal law. She also pointed out that the administration’s pattern of rapidly ending TPS for multiple countries raised concerns about whether proper evaluations were being conducted.
TPS, a humanitarian protection established for people fleeing conflict, natural disasters, or other crises, was first granted to Syrians in 2012 as the country descended into a devastating civil war. The program shields eligible migrants from deportation and grants them work authorization in the U.S. While the war in Syria has evolved, the situation remains unstable, making the legal protections especially significant for recipients.
The Trump administration is expected to appeal the ruling. Officials have consistently argued that TPS has been extended too broadly and that conditions in some countries no longer justify continued protection. However, critics—including Democratic lawmakers, immigration advocates, and employers—warn that ending TPS would send thousands back to unsafe environments and disrupt industries that rely on their labor.
The case comes just weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the administration to end TPS for 600,000 Venezuelan migrants. Courts are still reviewing similar terminations for recipients from Haiti, Honduras, Nepal, and Nicaragua. The Department of Homeland Security previously claimed Syria remained a hub of terrorism and that maintaining TPS conflicted with U.S. interests, a justification the judge found insufficient under federal requirements.
This ruling temporarily preserves protections for Syrians while the broader legal debate over the future of TPS continues.


Chicago Rejects New Federal Violence Prevention Grants After Policy Shift
Key Witness Seeks to Block Evidence in Potential Revival of Comey Case
U.S.–Russia Peace Talks Stall as Kremlin Rejects Key Proposals
Maduro Confirms “Respectful” Call With Trump, Signals Openness to Diplomatic Dialogue
Northwestern University to Restore Research Funding Under $75 Million Agreement with U.S. Government
Taiwan Signals Openness to Renew Ties with Honduras as Election Unfolds
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment
Judge Dismisses Charges Against Comey and Letitia James After Ruling on Prosecutor’s Appointment
IMF Deputy Dan Katz Visits China as Key Economic Review Nears
Netanyahu Seeks Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial
Michael Dell Pledges $6.25 Billion to Boost Children’s Investment Accounts Under Trump Initiative
CFPB Reaches $1.75 Million Settlement with MoneyLion Over Military Loan Overcharges
UN Chief Says Gaza Operation “Fundamentally Wrong” as Concerns Over War Crimes Grow
UPS MD-11 Crash Prompts Families to Prepare Wrongful Death Lawsuit
New Orleans Immigration Crackdown Sparks Fear as Federal Arrests Intensify
Bristol Myers Faces $6.7 Billion Lawsuit After Judge Allows Key Shareholder Claims to Proceed
Senators Warn Trump Against Unauthorized Venezuela Strike, Vow War Powers Push 



