South Korea's businesses complained that the EU’s carbon border tax would lead to unfair double taxation as the country has already adopted its cap-and-trade system.
The Federation of Korean Industries (FKI), which represents over 400 businesses, had requested the EU to exempt South Korea from its tariff plan, dubbed Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism.
The FKI, which added that it could grow into a new type of trade protectionism, has yet to receive a response from the EU.
The organization had not sent a similar request to the US, which is still in the early stages of planning.
Last month, the EU put forward plans to levy on importations by economies with laxer climate rules from 2026. US lawmakers followed suit, floating plans of including the tariff as part of a $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation bill.
Cho Gyeong-lyeob, the chief economist at the Korea Economic Research Institute, noted that South Korea's energy-intensive industries, such as steel and cement, are set to suffer if the carbon border tax is levied in a coercive manner.
The Bank of Korea (BOK) pinpointed the country's autos and shipbuilding industry to be hit most by the tariffs, with the steel industry next.
Cho added that the pace of cutting back industrial carbon emissions has to be in line with the development of green technologies, which could reduce emissions costs.
If both the EU and the US levy carbon border taxes, South Korea’s outbound shipments would shed 1.1 percent, or $7.1 billion, every year, according to the BOK.
The EU’s charge of $50 per ton of carbon dioxide emissions would cost South Korea’s exports $3.2 billion annually. If the US adopts the same $50 rule, the tariff would cost an additional $3.9 billion every year.
The tax could also eliminate South Korea's cost advantage in manufacturing and affect its trade ties with China, which is expected to be heavily hit by the tax rules as the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter.
The BOK noted that if the US and EU take into account the cap-and-trade system, which currently levies $15 for every ton of emissions, the tax would be cut by $35 per ton. That means South Korea’s annual exports would only shed 0.7 percent.


Britain Courts Anthropic Amid US Defense Department Dispute
Trump-Xi Summit 2026: U.S.-China Trade War Tensions and Tariff Talks
SpaceX Eyes Historic IPO at $1.75 Trillion Valuation
Microsoft Eyes $7B Texas Energy Deal to Power AI Data Centers
Japan's Services Sector Growth Slows in March Amid Rising Middle East Tensions
Luxury Car Sales in the Middle East Take a Hit Amid Iran War
India's Services Sector Growth Slows to 14-Month Low in March Amid Rising Costs
U.S. Dollar Climbs as Trump Escalates Rhetoric Against Iran
Norma Group Posts Revenue Decline in 2025, Eyes Modest Recovery in 2026
Trump Administration Plans 100% Tariffs on Pharmaceutical Imports
Private Credit Under Pressure: Is a Slow-Motion Crisis Unfolding?
Tesla Q1 2026 Deliveries Miss Estimates as AI Strategy Takes Center Stage
Bank of Japan Eyes Further Rate Hikes Amid Middle East Tensions and Inflation Pressures
SoftwareONE Posts 22.5% Revenue Surge in 2025 on Crayon Acquisition
Jefferies Upgrades Sodexo to Buy With €55 Target After Historic CEO Appointment
Ukrainian Drones and the #MadeByHousewives Movement: Kyiv Fires Back at Rheinmetall CEO
Samsung Electronics Eyes Record Q1 Profit Amid AI-Driven Chip Boom 



