After years of legal fighting and taking the battle to the highest court in the U.S., Samsung emerges victorious over Apple. In a unanimous decision, the justices presiding over the case stressed that the patent infringement only applied to the particular parts of the product instead of the whole thing. As a result, Samsung will not have to pay the $399 million in damages that Apple is suing for.
The ruling to favor Samsung was 8-0, Reuters reports, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying that those found guilty of violating certain design patents are not always required to pay out everything that they made while committing the infringement. In the case of Samsung, the infringement only applies to some of the components of its smartphones and not every single product that uses said components.
On that note, this also means that Samsung is not getting off scot-free. The South Korean company will still need to pay its American counterpart. It’s just not going to be as much as Apple was asking for.
The case has since been directed to the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, where the amount that Samsung will need to pay Apple will be decided. By all accounts, it would seem that the iPhone maker is only going to be receiving a pittance compared to the original asking price.
The effects of this ruling have a far-reaching impact on the tech industry and the patent industry as a whole, CNET reports. It essentially changed how design patent lawsuits are going to be approached from now on and how much the offending party will need to pay out.
For companies that were outright robbed of patents that they were applying to their products, this could be a disaster. When it comes to the so-called patent trolls, however, this could be a huge turning point that benefits the tech industry.


Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
U.S. Condemns South Africa’s Expulsion of Israeli Diplomat Amid Rising Diplomatic Tensions
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law
Federal Reserve Faces Subpoena Delay Amid Investigation Into Chair Jerome Powell
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026
SpaceX Updates Starlink Privacy Policy to Allow AI Training as xAI Merger Talks and IPO Loom
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment
Trump Family Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Over IRS Tax Disclosure
SpaceX Reports $8 Billion Profit as IPO Plans and Starlink Growth Fuel Valuation Buzz
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling
Nvidia Nears $20 Billion OpenAI Investment as AI Funding Race Intensifies
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Unlawfully Halted EV Charger Funding 



