After years of legal fighting and taking the battle to the highest court in the U.S., Samsung emerges victorious over Apple. In a unanimous decision, the justices presiding over the case stressed that the patent infringement only applied to the particular parts of the product instead of the whole thing. As a result, Samsung will not have to pay the $399 million in damages that Apple is suing for.
The ruling to favor Samsung was 8-0, Reuters reports, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying that those found guilty of violating certain design patents are not always required to pay out everything that they made while committing the infringement. In the case of Samsung, the infringement only applies to some of the components of its smartphones and not every single product that uses said components.
On that note, this also means that Samsung is not getting off scot-free. The South Korean company will still need to pay its American counterpart. It’s just not going to be as much as Apple was asking for.
The case has since been directed to the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, where the amount that Samsung will need to pay Apple will be decided. By all accounts, it would seem that the iPhone maker is only going to be receiving a pittance compared to the original asking price.
The effects of this ruling have a far-reaching impact on the tech industry and the patent industry as a whole, CNET reports. It essentially changed how design patent lawsuits are going to be approached from now on and how much the offending party will need to pay out.
For companies that were outright robbed of patents that they were applying to their products, this could be a disaster. When it comes to the so-called patent trolls, however, this could be a huge turning point that benefits the tech industry.


DOJ Urges Judge to Block Lawmakers’ Bid for Special Master in Jeffrey Epstein Records Case
South Korea Sees Limited Impact From New U.S. Tariffs on Advanced AI Chips
Trump Administration Appeals Judge’s Order Limiting ICE Tactics in Minneapolis
Baidu Shares Surge After Official Launch of Advanced Ernie 5.0 AI Model
Former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol Faces Historic Court Ruling Over Failed Martial Law Attempt
California Attorney General Orders xAI to Halt Illegal Grok Deepfake Imagery
Ericsson Plans SEK 25 Billion Shareholder Returns as Margins Improve Despite Flat Network Market
Federal Judge Clears Way for Jury Trial in Elon Musk’s Fraud Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft
DOJ Sues Virginia Over Failure to Provide Full Voter Registration Records
Boeing Reaches Tentative Settlement With Canadian Victim’s Family in 737 MAX Crash Lawsuits
Intel Stock Slides Despite Earnings Beat as Weak Q1 Outlook Raises Concerns
Tesla Plans FSD Subscription Price Hikes as Autonomous Capabilities Advance
HKEX’s Permissive IPO Rules Could Open Opportunities for Korea to Strengthen Its Position in International Listings
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer
Google Seeks Delay on Data-Sharing Order as It Appeals Landmark Antitrust Ruling
ICJ to Hear Landmark Genocide Case Against Myanmar Over Rohingya Crisis
ByteDance Finalizes Majority U.S.-Owned TikTok Joint Venture to Avert American Ban 



