Russia Seeks to Claw Back Soldier Bonuses After Crimes 
Ecuador Backs U.S. Sinking of Vessels in Pacific Anti-Drug Operation 
ECB Set for September Rate Hike as Energy Prices Fuel Inflation 
Trump Peace Envoys Meet Zelenskiy in Kyiv After Putin Talks 
Iran Threatens US With ‘Economic Warfare’ as Gulf Tensions Rise 
Japan Foreign Reserves Plunge $79.6 Billion After Record Yen Intervention 
China to Inject $45 Billion Into State Financial Institutions 
Japan GDP Growth Beats Forecast, Boosting BOJ Rate Hike Bets 
OPEC+ Expected to Hold October Oil Output Steady 
Putin Holds ‘Highly Useful’ Ukraine Peace Talks With Trump Envoys 
China Exports Surge 25% in August as Trade Surplus Hits $119 Billion 
US Stock Futures Mixed as Strong Jobs Data Boosts Fed Rate Hike Bets 
Israel Strikes Southern Lebanon After Hezbollah Drone Attack 
European Stocks Flat as Iran Tensions, ECB Rate Hike Loom 
China Expands Influence in Global Gold Market 
Lavrov Accuses Germany of ‘Declaring War’ on Russia 
Asian Currencies Mixed as Yen Rallies on BOJ Bets 
Add as a preferred source on Google
The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) has advised British Finance Minister Rachel Reeves to break her pre-election promise not to raise taxes on working people and instead increase income tax in next month’s budget. The institute argues that other methods to raise the £30 billion ($40 billion) in needed revenue would be more harmful to the economy.
Before last year’s election, Reeves and Prime Minister Keir Starmer pledged not to raise income tax, social security contributions, or value-added tax (VAT) on “working people,” nor to increase the main corporation tax rate. However, growing fiscal challenges have put pressure on the government to reconsider these commitments.
In her first budget, Reeves raised National Insurance Contributions paid by employers but maintained her stance against increasing taxes on employees. Since then, Britain’s borrowing costs have exceeded expectations, a planned £5 billion cut in welfare spending has been scrapped, and the Office for Budget Responsibility has signaled weaker growth forecasts. Despite these challenges, both Starmer and Reeves have continued to assure voters they will uphold their tax promises.
NIESR cautioned that alternative revenue sources, such as a new wealth tax or a land value tax, could have unintended economic consequences. A wealth tax might discourage savings and investment, while a land value tax, though efficient, would take significant time to implement.
The think tank concluded that increasing one of the major taxes—corporation tax, income tax, employee National Insurance, or VAT—may be inevitable. Although a modest income tax rise could reduce consumer spending and work incentives, NIESR noted it would require only a small percentage increase compared to other taxes. Conversely, an equivalent VAT rise could have a far greater short-term economic impact, cutting disposable income by nearly 3% and shrinking GDP by almost 1%, adjusted for inflation.
