Trump’s Iraq Envoy Mark Savaya Ousted Amid U.S.-Iraq Tensions Over Iran Influence 
Wall Street Slides as Warsh Fed Nomination, Hot Inflation, and Precious Metals Rout Shake Markets 
Medvedev Warns World Is Growing More Dangerous but Says Russia Seeks to Avoid Global Conflict 
South Korea Exports Surge in January on AI Chip Demand, Marking Fastest Growth in 4.5 Years 
U.S. Government Faces Brief Shutdown as Congress Delays Funding Deal 
Democrats Score Surprise Texas State Senate Win, Fueling Momentum Ahead of 2026 Midterms 
India Budget 2025 Highlights Manufacturing Push but Falls Short of Market Expectations 
IMF Forecasts Global Inflation Decline as Growth Remains Resilient 
EU Recovery Fund Faces Bottlenecks Despite Driving Digital and Green Projects 
Starmer’s China Visit Highlights Western Balancing Act Amid U.S.-China Rivalry 
Trump Proposes Two-Year Shutdown of Kennedy Center Amid Ongoing Turmoil 
Keir Starmer Urges Prince Andrew to Testify in U.S. Epstein Investigation 
Rafah Border Crossing to Reopen for Palestinians as Israel Coordinates with Egypt and EU 
U.S. Stock Futures Slip as Markets Brace for Big Tech Earnings and Key Data 
South Korea Factory Activity Hits 18-Month High as Export Demand Surges 
U.S.–Venezuela Relations Show Signs of Thaw as Top Envoy Visits Caracas 
The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) has advised British Finance Minister Rachel Reeves to break her pre-election promise not to raise taxes on working people and instead increase income tax in next month’s budget. The institute argues that other methods to raise the £30 billion ($40 billion) in needed revenue would be more harmful to the economy.
Before last year’s election, Reeves and Prime Minister Keir Starmer pledged not to raise income tax, social security contributions, or value-added tax (VAT) on “working people,” nor to increase the main corporation tax rate. However, growing fiscal challenges have put pressure on the government to reconsider these commitments.
In her first budget, Reeves raised National Insurance Contributions paid by employers but maintained her stance against increasing taxes on employees. Since then, Britain’s borrowing costs have exceeded expectations, a planned £5 billion cut in welfare spending has been scrapped, and the Office for Budget Responsibility has signaled weaker growth forecasts. Despite these challenges, both Starmer and Reeves have continued to assure voters they will uphold their tax promises.
NIESR cautioned that alternative revenue sources, such as a new wealth tax or a land value tax, could have unintended economic consequences. A wealth tax might discourage savings and investment, while a land value tax, though efficient, would take significant time to implement.
The think tank concluded that increasing one of the major taxes—corporation tax, income tax, employee National Insurance, or VAT—may be inevitable. Although a modest income tax rise could reduce consumer spending and work incentives, NIESR noted it would require only a small percentage increase compared to other taxes. Conversely, an equivalent VAT rise could have a far greater short-term economic impact, cutting disposable income by nearly 3% and shrinking GDP by almost 1%, adjusted for inflation.
