The United States Supreme Court granted the legal challenge by an Alabama death row inmate. The inmate sued months before surviving the lethal injection process, which they argued breached constitutional protections against unusual forms of punishment.
The Supreme Court on Monday granted the legal challenge filed by convicted murderer Kenneth Smith, who sued months before surviving the state’s lethal injection process. Smith was convicted for his role in a murder-for-hire plot in 1988. Smith filed the lawsuit in federal court in August last year, arguing that the state’s lethal injection process would clear the way for cruel and unusual punishment that would go against the US Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, citing the problems that Alabama officials encountered in executing inmates on death row including the accessing of veins to insert the intravenous lines.
The method by the state posed “an intolerable risk of torture, cruelty, or substantial pain,” said the lawsuit. The issue is whether, under precedent in the Supreme Court, the use of injecting nitrogen hypoxia – approved by the Alabama legislature but not used by the Department of Corrections – is a legally available alternative.
The case has since returned to the justices after initially turning away an appeal by Alabama officials of a decision made by the lower court to revive Smith’s lawsuit that sought to block the state from executing him through lethal injection. Smith is now seeking another method to be executed.
The court granted the challenge by seven to two, with conservative justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissenting.
Alabama’s Republican Attorney General Steve Marshall expressed disappointment with the court’s decision and said that his office was reviewing the decision to determine the next steps to be taken.
Meanwhile, Washington has disclosed that it has deployed 1,419 nuclear warheads in its arsenal, part of its commitments under the New START treaty it has with Russia as it looks to pressure Moscow to do the same. The announcement by the state department also appears to reverse its previous decision of not sharing the data.
“The United States continues to view transparency among nuclear weapon states as extremely valuable for reducing the likelihood of misperception, miscalculation, and costly arms competitions,” said the agency’s spokesperson in a statement on Tuesday.
Photo by Claire Anderson/Unsplash(CC by 2.0)


Trump Administration Proposes Sweeping Limits on Gender-Affirming Care for Children
Trump Administration Plans Major Increase in Denaturalization Cases for Naturalized U.S. Citizens
Trump Announces $1,776 Cash Bonus for U.S. Military Personnel Ahead of Christmas
Trump Signs Order to Ease Federal Marijuana Rules, Signaling Major Policy Shift
UN Warns Gaza Humanitarian Aid at Risk as Israel Registration Rules Threaten NGO Operations
Honduras Election Recount Delayed Amid Protests and Political Tensions
Syria, Kurds and U.S. Race to Show Progress on SDF Integration Deal
Republicans Raise National Security Concerns Over Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools
Union-Aligned Investors Question Amazon, Walmart and Alphabet on Trump Immigration Policies
Trump Signals Progress in Ukraine Peace Talks Ahead of U.S.–Russia Meeting
Argentina Unions Rally Against Milei’s Labor Reform as Congress Debates Key Bill
Putin Signals Possible Peace or Continued War in Ukraine at Major Year-End Address
Kennedy Center Reportedly Renamed Trump-Kennedy Center After Board Vote
U.S. Senators Move Toward Deal to Strengthen Military Helicopter Safety Rules
Jared Isaacman Confirmed as NASA Administrator, Becomes 15th Leader of U.S. Space Agency
Canada Signals Delay in US Tariff Deal as Talks Shift to USMCA Review 



