The United States Supreme Court granted the legal challenge by an Alabama death row inmate. The inmate sued months before surviving the lethal injection process, which they argued breached constitutional protections against unusual forms of punishment.
The Supreme Court on Monday granted the legal challenge filed by convicted murderer Kenneth Smith, who sued months before surviving the state’s lethal injection process. Smith was convicted for his role in a murder-for-hire plot in 1988. Smith filed the lawsuit in federal court in August last year, arguing that the state’s lethal injection process would clear the way for cruel and unusual punishment that would go against the US Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, citing the problems that Alabama officials encountered in executing inmates on death row including the accessing of veins to insert the intravenous lines.
The method by the state posed “an intolerable risk of torture, cruelty, or substantial pain,” said the lawsuit. The issue is whether, under precedent in the Supreme Court, the use of injecting nitrogen hypoxia – approved by the Alabama legislature but not used by the Department of Corrections – is a legally available alternative.
The case has since returned to the justices after initially turning away an appeal by Alabama officials of a decision made by the lower court to revive Smith’s lawsuit that sought to block the state from executing him through lethal injection. Smith is now seeking another method to be executed.
The court granted the challenge by seven to two, with conservative justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissenting.
Alabama’s Republican Attorney General Steve Marshall expressed disappointment with the court’s decision and said that his office was reviewing the decision to determine the next steps to be taken.
Meanwhile, Washington has disclosed that it has deployed 1,419 nuclear warheads in its arsenal, part of its commitments under the New START treaty it has with Russia as it looks to pressure Moscow to do the same. The announcement by the state department also appears to reverse its previous decision of not sharing the data.
“The United States continues to view transparency among nuclear weapon states as extremely valuable for reducing the likelihood of misperception, miscalculation, and costly arms competitions,” said the agency’s spokesperson in a statement on Tuesday.
Photo by Claire Anderson/Unsplash(CC by 2.0)


Ukraine’s NATO Concession Unlikely to Shift Peace Talks, Experts Say
Belarus Pledges to Halt Smuggling Balloons Into Lithuania
Russian Drone Attack Hits Turkish Cargo Ship Carrying Sunflower Oil to Egypt, Ukraine Says
Israeli Airstrike in Gaza Targets Senior Hamas Commander Amid Ceasefire Tensions
Judge Orders Return of Seized Evidence in Comey-Related Case, DOJ May Seek New Warrant
Trump Sues BBC for Defamation Over Edited Capitol Riot Speech Clip
Air Force One Delivery Delayed to 2028 as Boeing Faces Rising Costs
Global Leaders Condemn Deadly Antisemitic Shooting at Sydney’s Bondi Beach During Hanukkah
Hong Kong Democratic Party Disbands After Member Vote Amid Security Crackdown
U.S. Suspends UK Technology Deal Amid Trade Disputes Under Trump Administration
Lukashenko Says Maduro Welcome in Belarus Amid Rising U.S.-Venezuela Tensions
Supporters Gather Ahead of Verdict in Jimmy Lai’s Landmark Hong Kong National Security Trial
Bolivia Orders Pre-Trial Detention of Former President Luis Arce Over Embezzlement Probe
U.S. Soldiers Killed in ISIS Attack in Palmyra, Syria During Counterterrorism Mission
Thousands Protest in Brazil Against Efforts to Reduce Jair Bolsonaro’s Prison Sentence
New Epstein Photos Surface Showing Trump as Lawmakers Near Document Release Deadline 



