Unilever (LON:ULVR) has rejected claims it forced out former Ben & Jerry’s CEO Dave Stever over the ice cream brand’s progressive activism. In a recent court filing, Unilever stated it had offered Stever a higher-paying role in its global ice cream division, which is set to spin off, but he chose to resign on March 31. The filing also seeks dismissal of Ben & Jerry’s lawsuit, which alleges Unilever tried to dismantle its board and suppress its activism, including protests against the war in Gaza and criticism of former U.S. President Donald Trump.
Unilever accused Ben & Jerry’s Chair Anuradha Mittal of using the lawsuit to publicly attack the company, claiming the brand’s “staunchly pro-Palestinian, anti-Israeli stance” hurt its reputation and investor relations. Ben & Jerry’s lawyer, Shahmeer Halepota, dismissed Unilever’s defense as “revisionism,” accusing the company of retaliation and suppressing dissent.
The lawsuit centers on a 2000 agreement when Unilever acquired the Vermont-based company, allowing Ben & Jerry’s to maintain an independent board to uphold its social mission. Unilever claims Mittal breached confidentiality by publicizing internal employment discussions and making false allegations.
Earlier this week, Unilever confirmed its planned ice cream division spinoff, including brands like Breyers and Magnum, remains on track to operate independently by July 1, with separate financial reporting by the fourth quarter. Despite the legal dispute, Unilever emphasized that Ben & Jerry’s is not for sale.
The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York under No. 24-08641, marks a significant clash between corporate governance and brand activism.


OpenAI Explores Partnership With The Trade Desk to Expand ChatGPT Advertising
USTR Launches New Section 301 Trade Investigations After Supreme Court Tariff Ruling
OpenAI Explores New Code-Hosting Platform to Reduce Dependence on GitHub
Robinhood Launches Premium Platinum Credit Card to Compete With AmEx and JPMorgan
Supreme Court Reviews Trump Administration Policies on Tariffs, Immigration, and Federal Power
Panama Investigates CK Hutchison’s Port Unit After Court Voids Canal Contracts
Federal Court Fines Mobil Oil Australia A$16 Million for Misleading Fuel Claims
Does international law still matter? The strike on the girls’ school in Iran shows why we need it
Defense Contractors Move to Drop Anthropic AI After Trump Administration Ban
DHL Forecasts Higher 2026 Operating Profit Despite Global Shipping Disruptions
U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs, Deepening Global Trade Uncertainty
California Seeks Court Order to Halt Amazon’s Alleged Price Inflation Practices
California Court Rejects xAI Bid to Block AI Data Transparency Law
Blackstone’s BCRED Fund Sees $1.7B Net Outflows as Private Credit Concerns Shake Investors
Inspire Brands IPO Could Raise $2 Billion as Roark Capital Explores Public Listing
Wizz Air Receives Tentative U.S. Approval for UK–U.S. Flights Amid Rising Travel Demand 



