Andy Burnham Emerges as Favorite After Keir Starmer Resigns 
Rubio Gulf Tour Aims to Reassure Allies on Trump’s Iran Deal 
Japan, U.S. Discuss Yen Weakness as Currency Intervention Concerns Grow 
Russia Signals Frustration Over Unfulfilled U.S. Commitments After Alaska Summit 
US Delivers $13M Autonomous Maritime Drones to Philippines 
US-Iran De-Escalation Shifts Washington’s Focus to AI Regulation and Crypto Legislation 
Trump Threatens ABC News Lawsuit Over Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Coverage 
Pirro Warns of Prosecution for Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Vandalism Amid Renovation Issues 
China Adds MP Materials, USA Rare Earth to Export Control List Amid Escalating U.S.-China Trade Tensions 
Rubio Faces Gulf Skepticism Over U.S.-Iran Peace Deal 
California Court Dismisses Trump Administration Lawsuit Against Los Angeles Sanctuary Policy 
UNAIDS Urges U.S. to Reconsider South Africa HIV Funding Withdrawal 
Russian Air Strikes Injure Six Across Ukraine as Kyiv Issues Air Raid Alert 
Trump’s Quantum Push Lifts IBM Stock as CEO Arvind Krishna Receives White House Praise 
Pedro Sanchez’s Wife Ordered to Stand Trial in Spain Corruption Case 
Peru Election Dispute Deepens as Roberto Sanchez Rejects Runoff Results 
US Military Strike on Suspected Drug Trafficking Vessel Leaves Two Dead in Caribbean 
One of the figures that have been caught up in the long-ranging case surrounding the Capitol insurrection is Republican Rep. Mo Brooks, who was seen at the rally of disgraced former President Donald Trump hours before the riots. This week, the Justice Department refused to defend Brooks in a lawsuit stemming from the insurrection.
Reuters reports that in a court filing made Tuesday, the DOJ said that it will not defend Brooks in a lawsuit filed against him by Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell. The lawsuit filed by Swalwell alleged that Brooks was also involved in the conspiracy to instigate the insurrection that left five people dead and dozens of police officers severely injured.
Brooks demanded that the DOJ represent him in the suit, citing that he would be covered by the Westfall Act, which protects federal employees from being sued or actions they have taken as part of their jobs. However, the DOJ said that Brooks’ appearance at the rally on January 6 was a campaign activity and is not part of his duties as a congressman. The House of Representatives Counsel has also refused to defend Brooks.
The DOJ’s refusal to defend Brooks in the lawsuit suggests that it may do the same for Trump, whose refusal to accept his election loss and constant peddling of the false election fraud claims culminated in the riots. Trump is also one of the defendants in Swalwell’s lawsuit.
“Members of Congress are subject to a host of restrictions that carefully distinguish their official functions on the one hand, and campaign functions on the other,” said the DOJ in the filing. “Inciting or conspiring to foment a violent attack on the United States Congress is not within the scope of employment of a Representative -- or any federal employee -- and thus is not the sort of conduct for which the United States is properly substituted as a defendant under the Westfall Act.”
The House Select Committee tasked with investigating the Capitol insurrection held its first hearing this week with some of the injured police officers. With the committee holding subpoena powers, former federal prosecutor Nick Ackerman said that any politician that worked with the right-wing militias during the attack should be worried.
Ackerman explained on MSNBC that if there are House members that coordinated with right-wing extremist groups Three Percenters, the Proud Boys, or the Oath Keepers, they would be exposed and prosecuted.
