USPS Expands Electric Vehicle Fleet as Nationwide Transition Accelerates 
Michael Dell Pledges $6.25 Billion to Boost Children’s Investment Accounts Under Trump Initiative 
Australia Releases New National AI Plan, Opts for Existing Laws to Manage Risks 
Trump Calls for Permanent Pause on Migration After National Guard Shooting Near White House 
IMF Deputy Dan Katz Visits China as Key Economic Review Nears 
New Orleans Immigration Crackdown Sparks Fear as Federal Arrests Intensify 
U.S. Justice Department Orders Intensified Probe Into Antifa and Domestic Extremist Groups 
Australia Moves Forward With Teen Social Media Ban as Platforms Begin Lockouts 
China’s Expanding Maritime Military Presence Alarms Taiwan and Japan 
Japan Approves $117 Billion Budget to Power Stimulus and Support Growth 
Pentagon Probe Finds Hegseth’s Use of Signal Risked Exposing Sensitive Yemen Strike Details 
Apple Alerts EU Regulators That Apple Ads and Maps Meet DMA Gatekeeper Thresholds 
Taiwan Opposition Criticizes Plan to Block Chinese App Rednote Over Security Concerns 
UN Chief Says Gaza Operation “Fundamentally Wrong” as Concerns Over War Crimes Grow 
Trump Administration Halts Immigration, Green Card, and Citizenship Processing for 19 Countries 
U.S. Repatriation Flight Carrying 266 Venezuelan Migrants Lands in Caracas 
FDA Names Tracy Beth Høeg as Acting CDER Director After Richard Pazdur Announces Retirement 
A federal judge in Maryland has temporarily halted President Donald Trump’s efforts to ban diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in federal agencies and among government contractors. U.S. District Judge Adam Abelson ruled that the directives likely violate the First Amendment, citing concerns over free speech restrictions.
The lawsuit, filed by Baltimore and three organizations, argued that Trump's orders unlawfully suppressed constitutionally protected speech. Abelson agreed, stating that DEI initiatives have been legal for decades and that blocking them would cause "irreparable harm" by chilling free speech. His ruling prevents the Trump administration from enforcing the bans nationwide while the case proceeds.
Trump’s orders aimed to eliminate DEI programs from federal agencies, prohibit government contractors from implementing them, and direct the Justice Department to investigate companies with DEI policies. Supporters of DEI argue these programs are necessary to address longstanding discrimination, while Trump and other critics claim they foster reverse discrimination.
The ruling leaves uncertainty about previously implemented measures, such as the closure of DEI offices and termination of related staff. The White House, Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott’s office, and the groups involved in the lawsuit have not yet commented.
DEI policies gained momentum after the 2020 protests against racial injustice but have faced conservative pushback. Abelson found Trump's orders so vague that organizations were unsure how they applied to their programs, leading to fears of penalties. He concluded that plaintiffs had demonstrated a significant chilling effect on speech.
The Trump administration maintains that the orders do not suppress speech but address unlawful discrimination. However, Abelson’s ruling ensures DEI programs remain protected—for now—pending further legal proceedings.
