HiteJinro, a South Korean distiller company that makes soju and beer, is in hot water after it was allegedly caught changing the labels of its soju drink bottles. Local industry officials said that the company is doing this illegal act with the intention of misleading the consumers.
The officials said on Wednesday, Feb. 15, that HiteJinro replaced the labels of its Jinro Soju brand to make it appear that they are the brand's Zero Sugar version. In truth, the alcohol content of the drinks is 16.5% and definitely has some levels of sugar in them.
The Zero Sugar soju is said to be the newer type of clear alcoholic drink and has recently become very popular, especially in restaurants around Seoul. This has 16% of alcohol content, and it is different from the regular Jinro soju because their ingredients are not the same.
Moreover, The Korea Times reported that, unlike the original version, Zero Sugar has no fructose and only contains artificial sweeteners. This was created for drinkers who want to avoid sugar.
It was suggested that due to its rising popularity, the demand for the product is quite high, but the production may be slow. This may have prompted HiteJinro to just change the label to meet the demand and sell more since it has stocks of the original soju.
The publication mentioned that the act of putting on a false label on products is a clear violation of the country's Article 8 of the Act on Labeling and Advertising of Food. Offenders can end up in jail for up to five years or be fined up to KRW50 million or about $38,971.
Meanwhile, HiteJinro issued a statement regarding the allegation and denied it has intentionally changed the labels of its regular soju brand. The company explained that the mislabeling of the bottles was a complete mistake that was committed by its sales personnel who was working part-time.
HiteJinro further said the employee only replaced the front labels, and the back labels remained. This means that the information about ingredients that show sugar content was still displayed despite the error on the front label.
"We intended to change the labels only for sugar-free products as the previous one showed the 'Zero Sugar' phrase too small on the front label," a company official stated. "Our sales personnel didn't do it intentionally. It was a mistake."
Photo by: Javier Esteban/Unsplash


Anthropic Eyes $6B Decart AI Acquisition Ahead of Mega IPO
Sanrio Shares Plunge as Q1 Profit Miss Overshadows Strong Sales
Oil Prices Fall as U.S. Crude Inventories Surge and Hormuz Tensions Persist
UK Economy Posts Surprise June Growth as World Cup and Hot Weather Lift Activity
European Stocks Rise as U.S. Inflation Data Eases Fed Rate Hike Fears
Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Returns to Netflix With Major New Stake
Goldman Sachs Eyes Investors for Nvidia’s $500 Billion AI Financing Plan
KOSPI Rebounds 20% as Samsung, SK Hynix Lead South Korea Stock Rally
Trump Imposes New US Tariffs on Drone Imports Over National Security Concerns
Paramount Weighs CNN Sale as $110B Warner Bros. Discovery Deal Faces Antitrust Fight
Japan Government Backs Earlier BOJ Rate Hike as Inflation Pressures Build
CBA Posts Record A$10.98B Profit Despite Cautious Outlook
China Automakers Accelerate Global Expansion as Domestic Car Sales Slump
Oil Prices Slide as OPEC, IEA Cut 2026 Demand Forecasts
ANZ Home Loan Applications Drop 12% After Australia Property Tax Changes
S&P 500 Hits Record High as Soft Inflation Data Eases Fed Rate Hike Fears
Gold Prices Retreat From Two-Month High as Softer Inflation Eases Fed Rate Hike Bets 



