HiteJinro, a South Korean distiller company that makes soju and beer, is in hot water after it was allegedly caught changing the labels of its soju drink bottles. Local industry officials said that the company is doing this illegal act with the intention of misleading the consumers.
The officials said on Wednesday, Feb. 15, that HiteJinro replaced the labels of its Jinro Soju brand to make it appear that they are the brand's Zero Sugar version. In truth, the alcohol content of the drinks is 16.5% and definitely has some levels of sugar in them.
The Zero Sugar soju is said to be the newer type of clear alcoholic drink and has recently become very popular, especially in restaurants around Seoul. This has 16% of alcohol content, and it is different from the regular Jinro soju because their ingredients are not the same.
Moreover, The Korea Times reported that, unlike the original version, Zero Sugar has no fructose and only contains artificial sweeteners. This was created for drinkers who want to avoid sugar.
It was suggested that due to its rising popularity, the demand for the product is quite high, but the production may be slow. This may have prompted HiteJinro to just change the label to meet the demand and sell more since it has stocks of the original soju.
The publication mentioned that the act of putting on a false label on products is a clear violation of the country's Article 8 of the Act on Labeling and Advertising of Food. Offenders can end up in jail for up to five years or be fined up to KRW50 million or about $38,971.
Meanwhile, HiteJinro issued a statement regarding the allegation and denied it has intentionally changed the labels of its regular soju brand. The company explained that the mislabeling of the bottles was a complete mistake that was committed by its sales personnel who was working part-time.
HiteJinro further said the employee only replaced the front labels, and the back labels remained. This means that the information about ingredients that show sugar content was still displayed despite the error on the front label.
"We intended to change the labels only for sugar-free products as the previous one showed the 'Zero Sugar' phrase too small on the front label," a company official stated. "Our sales personnel didn't do it intentionally. It was a mistake."
Photo by: Javier Esteban/Unsplash


Ryan Cohen Rejects GameStop Pay Package, Prepares New eBay Acquisition Plan
Trump Orders DOJ Investigation Into Exxon, Chevron Over High Gas Prices
Apple Supplier Stocks Slide as Samsung, SK Hynix Lead Selloff After Apple Price Hikes
Asian Stocks Sink as Apple Price Hikes Spark AI Valuation Fears, South Korea and Japan Lead Selloff
OpenAI May Delay IPO to 2027 Amid $1 Trillion Valuation Goal
Nomura Stock Upgraded to Buy by BofA as Stronger ROE and Earnings Growth Boost Outlook
FedEx Stock Drops After Weak 2026 Earnings Forecast Despite Strong Q4 Results
Doncasters Raises $919 Million in NYSE IPO as Aerospace Growth Accelerates
Wall Street Ends Mixed as Tech Stocks Struggle Ahead of Micron Earnings
Bank Regulation Rollbacks in the U.S. and UK Could Increase Financial Risks, Study Warns
Oil Prices Rebound as Strait of Hormuz Tensions Return After Ship Attack Near Oman
South Korea’s KOSPI Plunges as Apple Price Hikes and OpenAI IPO Delay Shake AI Chip Stocks
Oil Prices Drop as Middle East Supply Recovery Eases Market Concerns
Gold Falls Below $4,000 as Strong Dollar and Fed Rate Hike Expectations Weigh on Prices
Australia Jobs Growth Strengthens Rate Hike Outlook
Bayer Wins Major U.S. Supreme Court Roundup Lawsuit, Shares Surge
Tesla and NatPower Partner on $5 Billion Battery Storage Expansion in Europe 



