HiteJinro, a South Korean distiller company that makes soju and beer, is in hot water after it was allegedly caught changing the labels of its soju drink bottles. Local industry officials said that the company is doing this illegal act with the intention of misleading the consumers.
The officials said on Wednesday, Feb. 15, that HiteJinro replaced the labels of its Jinro Soju brand to make it appear that they are the brand's Zero Sugar version. In truth, the alcohol content of the drinks is 16.5% and definitely has some levels of sugar in them.
The Zero Sugar soju is said to be the newer type of clear alcoholic drink and has recently become very popular, especially in restaurants around Seoul. This has 16% of alcohol content, and it is different from the regular Jinro soju because their ingredients are not the same.
Moreover, The Korea Times reported that, unlike the original version, Zero Sugar has no fructose and only contains artificial sweeteners. This was created for drinkers who want to avoid sugar.
It was suggested that due to its rising popularity, the demand for the product is quite high, but the production may be slow. This may have prompted HiteJinro to just change the label to meet the demand and sell more since it has stocks of the original soju.
The publication mentioned that the act of putting on a false label on products is a clear violation of the country's Article 8 of the Act on Labeling and Advertising of Food. Offenders can end up in jail for up to five years or be fined up to KRW50 million or about $38,971.
Meanwhile, HiteJinro issued a statement regarding the allegation and denied it has intentionally changed the labels of its regular soju brand. The company explained that the mislabeling of the bottles was a complete mistake that was committed by its sales personnel who was working part-time.
HiteJinro further said the employee only replaced the front labels, and the back labels remained. This means that the information about ingredients that show sugar content was still displayed despite the error on the front label.
"We intended to change the labels only for sugar-free products as the previous one showed the 'Zero Sugar' phrase too small on the front label," a company official stated. "Our sales personnel didn't do it intentionally. It was a mistake."
Photo by: Javier Esteban/Unsplash


US Stock Futures Hold Steady as Soft Inflation Data Eases Fed Rate Hike Fears
IEA Warns China Rare Earth Export Curbs Could Threaten $6.5 Trillion in Global Production
Oil Prices Rise as U.S. Strikes on Iran Raise Strait of Hormuz Supply Fears
Oil Prices Set for Weekly Surge as U.S.-Iran Conflict Fuels Supply Fears
Brazil Weighs IP Curbs, Patent Suspensions After New U.S. Tariffs
Wall Street Ends Lower as AI Selloff, Iran Tensions Weigh on Tech Stocks
GameStop Raises eBay Stake to 9.8% as Ryan Cohen Pushes $56 Billion Takeover Bid
Brent Oil Jumps 16% for Best Week Since April as US-Iran Conflict Fuels Supply Fears
SpaceX Stock Falls Below IPO Price as Investors Weigh Losses and Lockup Expiry
United Airlines Beats Q2 Earnings, Raises 2026 Profit Outlook Despite Higher Fuel Costs
Japan Core Inflation Seen Rising in June, Strengthening BOJ Rate Hike Outlook
NY Times Challenges Trump Administration Subpoenas Over Air Force One Report
PayPal Rejects $53 Billion Stripe-Advent Takeover Offer as Too Low: Report
Port of Los Angeles Posts Record June Cargo Volume as Importers Rush Ahead of U.S. Tariffs
Samsung Electronics America to Cut 739 New Jersey Jobs as Texas Headquarters Move Advances
Mikron H1 2026 Sales Fall 5.9% as Automation Weakness Weighs on Profit 



