U.S. Reinstates Sanctions on U.N. Expert Francesca Albanese Amid Legal Battle 
Trump Lawyers Face Scrutiny After Missing Deadline in $10 Billion BBC Defamation Lawsuit 
Starmer Hosts Zelenskiy, Macron and Merz for Ukraine Peace and Security Talks in London 
Italian Investigation Targets Israel’s Itamar Ben-Gvir Over Gaza Flotilla Activists 
Meta Challenges Australia’s Proposed Tech Tax, Citing U.S. Trade Agreement Concerns 
SEC Tokenized Stock Approval Still Expected as Regulatory Framework Advances 
US Expands Criminal Investigation Into Nicolas Maduro With New Florida Probe 
Trump Signs Executive Order to Expand Access to Federal Lands in the U.S. 
US Appeals Court Allows Trump Military Enlistment Ban on Transgender Recruits, Protects Current Service Members 
Lebanese President Urges Israel to Negotiate End to Conflict, Calls Military Approach Ineffective 
UN Blacklists Israel and Russia Over Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Claims 
Princess Anne’s Son Peter Phillips Marries Harriet Sperling at Royal Wedding in England 
DOJ Pushes to Resume Trump White House Ballroom Project After Security Incident 
France, Allies Prepare Coordinated Sanctions Over West Bank Settler Violence 
New World Screwworm Found Near U.S. Border Raises Threat to Cattle Industry and Beef Prices 
MOL Gets More Time to Negotiate Acquisition of Russian-Owned Stake in Serbia’s NIS 
The U.S. Supreme Court continues to back President Donald Trump’s aggressive immigration enforcement policies, recently allowing the administration to end temporary legal protections for over 800,000 migrants. In two recent rulings, the Court lifted injunctions blocking the termination of humanitarian parole and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for migrants from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, and Nicaragua—moves likely to lead to mass deportations.
Despite the broad support, the Court has emphasized constitutional due process. It ruled that migrants must receive adequate notice before removal, rejecting the administration’s attempt to deport Venezuelans under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act without proper legal recourse. Justices also criticized the practice of giving detainees only 24 hours’ notice before deportation, calling it unconstitutional.
Trump's hardline policies have drawn legal scrutiny since he resumed office in January, with the Court already intervening in seven immigration-related disputes. Legal experts argue that while the conservative majority often defers to executive power, it is unwilling to overlook blatant violations of legal rights. In April, the Court ordered the release of a wrongfully deported Salvadoran man, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, though he remains in custody in El Salvador.
Controversy also surrounds Trump's order to deport migrants to third countries like war-torn South Sudan. A federal judge halted the practice for violating due process, prompting the administration to seek Supreme Court intervention.
While the justices have allowed many deportations to proceed, legal scholars warn that removing legal protections without judicial explanation may set dangerous precedents. The Court is expected to rule soon on Trump’s bid to restrict birthright citizenship—a move that challenges long-held constitutional interpretations. As legal challenges mount, the Court faces the difficult task of balancing executive authority with constitutional protections.
