DOJ Ends Probe Into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Boosting Kevin Warsh Confirmation Prospects 
Malaysia Unveils Energy Security Plan Amid Iran Conflict and Rising Oil Costs 
US Sanctions Target Iran’s Shadow Banking Network and Terror Financing 
Medicare to Cover GLP-1 Weight-Loss and Diabetes Drugs Starting July 1 
Taiwan Court Fines Tokyo Electron Unit $4.78M in Major TSMC Trade Secrets Case 
Israel’s Secret Iraq Base Allegedly Supported Iran Air Campaign, WSJ Reports 
Trump-Xi Beijing Summit to Focus on Trade, Taiwan, and Boeing Deal 
Judge Delays SEC Settlement With Elon Musk Over Twitter Stock Disclosure Case 
Judge Rules DOGE Humanities Grant Cuts Unconstitutional 
Judge Rules Use of Military Lawyers in Civilian Prosecutions Is Lawful 
White House Withdraws Trump’s National Park Service Nominee Amid Criticism 
Dominican Republic Halts GoldQuest Mining Project Amid Environmental Protests 
Ghana Rejects U.S. Health Deal Over Data Sharing Concerns Amid Foreign Aid Shift 
US Trade Court Blocks Trump’s 10% Global Tariffs 
New York Moves to Ban Masked Law Enforcement During Immigration Operations 
US to Withdraw 5,000 Troops from Germany Amid Growing Rift with European Allies 
The U.S. Supreme Court continues to back President Donald Trump’s aggressive immigration enforcement policies, recently allowing the administration to end temporary legal protections for over 800,000 migrants. In two recent rulings, the Court lifted injunctions blocking the termination of humanitarian parole and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for migrants from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, and Nicaragua—moves likely to lead to mass deportations.
Despite the broad support, the Court has emphasized constitutional due process. It ruled that migrants must receive adequate notice before removal, rejecting the administration’s attempt to deport Venezuelans under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act without proper legal recourse. Justices also criticized the practice of giving detainees only 24 hours’ notice before deportation, calling it unconstitutional.
Trump's hardline policies have drawn legal scrutiny since he resumed office in January, with the Court already intervening in seven immigration-related disputes. Legal experts argue that while the conservative majority often defers to executive power, it is unwilling to overlook blatant violations of legal rights. In April, the Court ordered the release of a wrongfully deported Salvadoran man, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, though he remains in custody in El Salvador.
Controversy also surrounds Trump's order to deport migrants to third countries like war-torn South Sudan. A federal judge halted the practice for violating due process, prompting the administration to seek Supreme Court intervention.
While the justices have allowed many deportations to proceed, legal scholars warn that removing legal protections without judicial explanation may set dangerous precedents. The Court is expected to rule soon on Trump’s bid to restrict birthright citizenship—a move that challenges long-held constitutional interpretations. As legal challenges mount, the Court faces the difficult task of balancing executive authority with constitutional protections.
