The United States Supreme Court justices and federal judges are now made to adhere to stricter public disclosure rules. The rules would require the judges to disclose free trips, meals, or gifts received following calls by lawmakers and judicial transparency advocates.
A letter from the federal judiciary’s administrative wing confirmed the changes the justices and the judges are now required to adhere to was published on Tuesday by Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee who has long called for ethics reforms at the Supreme Court. Whitehouse said the disclosure rules for the judiciary are more relaxed than other branches of government.
“These new rules will make it much harder for justices to travel, dine, hunt, or vacation for free at the private resort of a wealthy corporate executive – especially one with business before their court – and avoid disclosing that information to the public,” said Whitehouse in a statement.
The changes took effect on March 14 and were adopted by a panel of the Judicial Conference, the policy-making body of the judiciary. The details of the changes were revealed in a March 23 letter to Whitehouse by federal judge Roslynn Mauskopf, the director of the Administrative Office of the US Courts. Supreme Court justices and federal judges must disclose stays at commercial properties like hotels and resorts and gifts of hospitality paid for by an entity or third-party other than the provider.
However, judges still do not have to disclose gifts that include food, lodging, or entertainment extended by an individual for non-business purposes.
Whitehouse and other Democratic lawmakers have also introduced legislation that would require the Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics, strengthen recusal standards for judges, and boost financial disclosure requirements. Last year, Congress passed legislation that further required judges to periodically disclose stock trades.
Meanwhile, a group of senior Democratic lawmakers is set to introduce legislation that would further ensure that weapons sales by the United States to foreign customers do not end up contributing to human rights abuses. The legislation, referred to as the Safeguard Act, would codify the new Conventional Arms Transfer policy that was introduced in February by the Biden administration to increase the emphasis on human rights concerns, according to information seen by Reuters.
Democratic senator Bob Menendez, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Rep. Gregory Meeks, the ranking Democrat in the House Foreign Affairs Committee, are leading the legislation with nine other congressional Democrats.


U.S.-China Taiwan Conflict Could Trigger Nuclear Escalation, IISS Warns
Hamas Commander Mohammad Odeh Killed in Gaza as Israel Intensifies Campaign
US Imposes Fresh Iran Oil Sanctions Despite Progress on Ceasefire Talks
Baltic Drone Incidents Raise NATO Security Concerns
US Condemns Russia’s Oreshnik Missile Strike, Warns Against New Attacks on Kyiv
U.S. Lawmakers Back Ukraine’s Request for More Patriot Missiles Amid Rising Russian Attacks
US and Iran Near Nuclear Deal as Ceasefire Extension Awaits Trump Approval
DOJ Opens Criminal Investigation Into E. Jean Carroll Over Alleged Perjury
Brazil Struggles to Stop Illegal Amazon Gold Mining as Gold Prices Surge
Trump Nears Decision on Iran Ceasefire Extension as Key Disputes Remain
Netanyahu Gaza Expansion Plan Sparks Hamas Condemnation and International Concern
Russia Prepares New Large-Scale Attack on Ukraine, Zelenskiy Warns
Kentucky School District Secures $27 Million in Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Settlements
US Tightens Ebola Controls as Congo Outbreak Sparks Global Concern
US Launches New Trade Investigation Into Vietnam Over Intellectual Property Concerns
Netanyahu Orders Expansion of Israeli Control in Gaza to 70%
Flavio Bolsonaro Meets Trump, JD Vance, and Marco Rubio Amid Brazil Political Crisis 



