The United States Supreme Court justices and federal judges are now made to adhere to stricter public disclosure rules. The rules would require the judges to disclose free trips, meals, or gifts received following calls by lawmakers and judicial transparency advocates.
A letter from the federal judiciary’s administrative wing confirmed the changes the justices and the judges are now required to adhere to was published on Tuesday by Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee who has long called for ethics reforms at the Supreme Court. Whitehouse said the disclosure rules for the judiciary are more relaxed than other branches of government.
“These new rules will make it much harder for justices to travel, dine, hunt, or vacation for free at the private resort of a wealthy corporate executive – especially one with business before their court – and avoid disclosing that information to the public,” said Whitehouse in a statement.
The changes took effect on March 14 and were adopted by a panel of the Judicial Conference, the policy-making body of the judiciary. The details of the changes were revealed in a March 23 letter to Whitehouse by federal judge Roslynn Mauskopf, the director of the Administrative Office of the US Courts. Supreme Court justices and federal judges must disclose stays at commercial properties like hotels and resorts and gifts of hospitality paid for by an entity or third-party other than the provider.
However, judges still do not have to disclose gifts that include food, lodging, or entertainment extended by an individual for non-business purposes.
Whitehouse and other Democratic lawmakers have also introduced legislation that would require the Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics, strengthen recusal standards for judges, and boost financial disclosure requirements. Last year, Congress passed legislation that further required judges to periodically disclose stock trades.
Meanwhile, a group of senior Democratic lawmakers is set to introduce legislation that would further ensure that weapons sales by the United States to foreign customers do not end up contributing to human rights abuses. The legislation, referred to as the Safeguard Act, would codify the new Conventional Arms Transfer policy that was introduced in February by the Biden administration to increase the emphasis on human rights concerns, according to information seen by Reuters.
Democratic senator Bob Menendez, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Rep. Gregory Meeks, the ranking Democrat in the House Foreign Affairs Committee, are leading the legislation with nine other congressional Democrats.


Trump Backs Down on Iran Strikes After Gulf Allies Sound the Alarm
Trump Visits Graceland, Pays Tribute to Elvis Presley During Memphis Trip
US-Iran Ceasefire Talks Underway: What You Need to Know
ICE Arrest of Guatemalan Woman at San Francisco Airport Sparks Outrage
U.S. Deploys Elite 82nd Airborne Troops to Middle East Amid Iran Tensions
US Accelerates Taiwan Arms Deliveries Amid Rising China Threat
U.S. Senate Confirms Markwayne Mullin as New Homeland Security Secretary
Kim Jong Un Declares Nuclear Forces Permanent, Labels South Korea "Most Hostile State"
Bachelet Pushes Forward With UN Secretary-General Bid Despite Chile's Withdrawal
Pakistan's Diplomatic Rise: Mediating U.S.-Iran Peace Talks
U.S.-Iran Peace Talks Gain Momentum Amid Ongoing Conflict
Trump's Overhaul of American History: Museums, Monuments, and Cultural Institutions
Bolsonaro Released from ICU After Lung Infection Battle
Trump Says Iran Offered Major Energy Concession Amid Ongoing Negotiations
Trump's Iran Strike Decision: How Netanyahu's Final Call Shaped Operation Epic Fury
Trump Administration Settles Lawsuit Barring Federal Agencies from Pressuring Social Media Censorship 



