Australia Extends Fuel Sulphur Relaxation Amid Iran War Supply Disruptions 
North Korea Fires Ballistic Missile Eastward Amid Rising Global Tensions 
Trump and IRS in Settlement Talks Over $10 Billion Tax Return Leak Lawsuit 
South Korea Denies U.S. Intelligence Restrictions Over North Korea Nuclear Site Disclosure 
Peru Election 2025: Vote Count Delays Spark Calls to Remove Electoral Chief 
Trump's Iran Claims Spark Market Confusion Over Strait of Hormuz 
Trump Administration Moves to Deport Iranian Academic Yousof Azizi Over Alleged Visa Fraud 
Anthropic CEO Meets Trump Officials to Discuss Powerful New AI Model Mythos 
Brazil, Spain, and Mexico Unite to Support Cuba Amid U.S. Blockade 
Ukraine's Svyrydenko Returns from U.S. With Renewed Support and Diplomatic Momentum 
U.S.-Iran Tensions Escalate as Hormuz Crisis Deepens Amid Ceasefire Strains 
North Korea Fires Multiple Ballistic Missiles Amid Growing Nuclear Ambitions 
IMF and World Bank Resume Ties with Venezuela, Opening Door to Billions in Funding 
U.S. Weapons Delays to Europe Amid Ongoing Iran Conflict 
House Republicans Near Deal on FISA Extension with Limited Reforms 
U.S. and Philippines to Build 4,000-Acre Tech Hub Under Pax Silica Initiative 
Iran Closes Strait of Hormuz Again After Brief Reopening, Rattling Global Energy Markets 
The United States Supreme Court rejected a bid by Republican attorneys general in several states to revive the hardline immigration policies during the Trump administration. Such policies included barring immigrants that are likely qualified to require government benefits from gaining lawful residency.
The Conservative-majority Supreme Court Justices turned down an appeal by 14 Republican state attorneys general led by Texas GOP attorney general Ken Paxton of a ruling by the lower court against their request to mount a legal defense to former President Donald Trump’s “public charge” immigration policy after President Joe Biden’s administration stopped defending the policy eventually rescinding it. Biden ended the policy by March 2021 after it was implemented by his immediate predecessor in February 2020.
The Republican officials told the justices that they should be able to defend the Trump-era rule as it can save states an estimated $1 billion overall annually. In a 2019 rule, the Trump administration expanded the definition of “public charge” that would make an immigrant ineligible for legal permanent residency in the US.
The expanded restriction also targeted immigrants who receive government benefits, including Medicaid insurance and food stamps for over 12 months in any three-year period.
A federal judge in Illinois vacated the rule nationwide, later rejecting the GOP attempt to intervene. The judge said the request by the state officials came too late, and the Chicago 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals agreed in June last year.
The high court also heard arguments in a separate case last year by Republican state officials for a defense of the Trump-era charge, but ultimately dismissed the case.
Also on Monday, the Supreme Court is seeking feedback from the Biden administration on whether the justices should determine a publicly-funded charter school in North Carolina violated the rights of female students who were deemed “fragile vessels” by the school’s founder in requiring girls to wear skirts.
The justices are considering whether to hear the appeal of the Charter Day School of a lower court’s ruling that the dress code violated the 14th Amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law. The court has asked US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar to file a brief on behalf of the Biden administration over the litigation and whether the Supreme Court should take up the case.
